Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve McCormick (September 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Econohammer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Steve McCormick has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steve McCormick. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve McCormick (October 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve McCormick (executive) has been accepted

edit
 
Steve McCormick (executive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Berkeley Institute for Data Science - Logo.png

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:Berkeley Institute for Data Science - Logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley Institute for Data Science (October 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. /wia /tlk /cntrb 12:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley Institute for Data Science (October 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 04:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley Institute for Data Science (November 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berkeley Institute for Data Science has been accepted

edit
 
Berkeley Institute for Data Science, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 08:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lil Miss Hot Mess has been accepted

edit
 
Lil Miss Hot Mess, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nosebagbear (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Lil Miss Hot Mess

edit

Hello, Econohammer,

Thank you for creating Lil Miss Hot Mess.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The first quote, while not the full paragraph, is still longer than desired for a quote.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nosebagbear}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nosebagbear (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Greg Hammer redirected to Red Bull Records

edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, while patrolling the Greg Hammer article, I came to the conclusion that neither the sources listed in the article, nor any sources I could find elsewhere online, showed that the subject of the article passed our inclusion standards for biographies. As such, I have turned the article into a redirect to Red Bull Records, where I added some information about Hammer. Cheers, Mach61 07:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply