Thanks for your suggestion (and welcome to Wikipedia!). The problem I was referring to (if I understand the comment you're talking about) is about the category, Category:Ecology. That category is in both the "Biology" and "Earth sciences" categories, reflecting the more-than-biology aspect you refer to. The actual problem is that there are too many individual articles in the Ecology category, most of which should be classified more specifically. (For example, some articles should be in Category:Limnology, some should be in Category:Behavioral ecology, some should be in Category:Biodiversity, etc., instead of the overly broad "Ecology".)--ragesoss 03:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

P.S.: Here is some welcome boilerplate with possibly helpful links.

Welcome!

Hello, Eco interpreter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!