Your edits to Hawiye edit

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hawiye. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 14:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Gurage edit

Regarding this edit: Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Gurage. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 14:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please explain your edits edit

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Hawiye. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . If you believe you have a valid reason for deleting this material, please explain it on Talk:Hawiye. Unexplained deletions are assumed to be vandalism. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John Reaves (talk) 04:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for being a sockpuppet of User:Finfinne used to evade a block.
If you feel this block is in error, please place {{unblock}} on this page and explain why, or e-mail me or any other administrator.
bbatsell ¿? 04:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

What are you trying to accomplish? edit

You appear to be very focused on removing valid citations from the Hawiye article, along with other deletions and unexplained edits. If you are trying to make legitimate changes to these articles, you must explain your intentions on the article talk pages. If you continue to remove valid citations without explaining yourself, your edits will continue to be treated as vandalism and reverted. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll also chime in with a similar questioning of the intent. The so-called map by the "CIA" from "2005" was a crude attempt to eliminate or mis-describe some of the tribes of Somalia from discussion. The national boundaries also were far off. Please do not try to pull the wool over people's eyes. While you might have valid reasons you wish to see some information updated, we are here to work for the closest approximation to the truth, not to distort it for any reasons. --Petercorless 04:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply