Eartheaven1

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia, as you did in Time travel. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Please note: Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 05:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)}

External link added to Heaven

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. --Daduzi ^talk 07:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Civility

With regards to your comments on User talk:Daduzi: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. If you display this type of behaviour again on Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ➨ ЯEDVERS 10:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Time Travel to Heaven Research Center

Hi there, I removed the link to the site in question because it isn't really relevant to the wider issue of heaven (see Wikipedia:External Links for a list of criteria of what is and is not considered acceptable for external links). Furthermore, since it seems like an at least partially commercial site, and your only contributions thus far have been to put links to the site in two articles, I felt that it qualified as spam. If you feel that was unjustified I apologise, however, I suggest you concentrate on adding content to articles for the time being rather than just external links, even if they are written by an academician (is that an academic magician, by the way? Can he make research papers appear out of a hat and cut graduate students in two?). I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia, and suggest you read the Wikipedia welcome pages thoroughly to avoid situations like this in the future.

--Daduzi ^talk 15:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the link again. I suggest that if you feel there is information in the website that is relevant to the article you add it into the text of the article and cite the website as a source. Personally, though, I can't see how it would be relevant since it's very much a minority theory. --Daduzi ^talk 19:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

There's no point in arguing with this guy. --67.172.10.82 06:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing all content from Heaven

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Daduzi ^talk 23:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)