Eamon914

AfD nomination of HR systems

I have nominated HR systems, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HR systems. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TN‑X-Man 13:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

HR systems

Hi there, welcome to Wikipedia. Just thought I'd let you know that the article HR systems has been speedily deleted as an infringement of copyright from this document. Per Wikipedia's policy on copyright violations, the encyclopaedia cannot accept such material, and indeed most text simply copied and pasted from a web page (the exception being anything compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License). For further information on this, you might want to check out Wikipedia:Copyrights. Cheers, Gr1st (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Vizual

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vizual, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.vizual.co.uk/about-vizual. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vizual

A tag has been placed on Vizual requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WWGB (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I have deleted the article, becuase it includes copyrighted material. If you are the copyright holder, you'll want to have a look at Donating Copyrighted Materials policy, which explains what your next steps are. Follow the steps on that page to document your ownership of the copyright, which would then let you license the content for use at Wikipedia. Remember, though, once it's used here, it can be edited and changed by anyone. Please use the {{helpme}} tag on this page if you need further assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 13:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vizual

The article Vizual has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:COMPANY, cannot find significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. January (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)