Dylanand

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.max-viz.com/12dec07/About_EVS.html. As a copyright violation, EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Whispering 03:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem: EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.max-viz.com/12dec07/About_EVS.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! V. Joe (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems

A tag has been placed on EVS - Enhanced Vision Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —Ceran (Fly!) 18:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Enhanced vision system (EVS)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Enhanced vision system (EVS), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.max-viz.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=15&Itemid=21. As a copyright violation, Enhanced vision system (EVS) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Enhanced vision system (EVS) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Enhanced vision system (EVS) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Enhanced vision system (EVS) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Enhanced vision system (EVS).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Jll (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

The article Max-Viz has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Max-viz

A tag has been placed on Max-viz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. LetsdrinkTea 22:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Max-viz. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Enhanced Vision Systems. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Kyle1278 (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Enhanced Vision Systems, you will be blocked from editing. No more spam articles. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enahnced vision system

A tag has been placed on Enahnced vision system, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Madlobster (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. – B.hotep •talk• 21:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the email you sent 15/07/09 22:42

You said:

“ I don't understand why you block my content for EVS. other companies have blatant ads, see FLIR our competitor. That should removed. We design, manufacture and market EVS and are the only ones who do so exclusively so we are more relevant to EVS and enhanced vision systems and we should have a say if wikipedia. ”

I will respond in due course. – B.hotep •talk• 07:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

As far as I can see, there is no comparison between the FLIR Systems article and the one on your company which you have been trying to insert for nearly a year now. The other article is written with a neutral point of view by a number of unattached editors and has, at the last count, 28 largely independent, third-party sources. While, admittedly, in did start off life in a similar style to your one, it grew to be more neutral. But, there was no constant pushing of the article. Insistence of inclusion tends to meet resistance to inclusion around these parts, especially when it comes to articles written about a company, by a company with the view that "you should have your say" on Wikipedia. When all's said and done, if you wish to appeal the block, the instructions to do so are included in the text of the block notice above. It will be reviewed by an independent administrator, but your past editing history, I might add, (including inserting false information into your competitor's article [1]) may go against you in this case. – B.hotep •talk• 08:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)