This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dxnathi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit that user page Stevence SA was created under Nathanielbapela012 and Dxnathi IP address. This is because I am using a second hand phone that was being used by the original user of Stevence SA. I admit that Nathanielbapela012 and Dxnathi was created by me. It was not necessary to block my user page user:Dxnathi as I created 4 clean articles. I didn't disrupt or damage anything with this user page. I officially made 111 edits before I got blocked. I promise I'll never create any account and I'm hoping to use user:Dxnathi as my future user page. I am looking forward in editing and creating articles to make Wikipedia a better place for everything. If I luckily get unblocked I wish my IP block to be exempted for future purposes

Decline reason:

I very strongly doubt that will happen after this edit, which I just fixed. One of the mortal sins of Wikipedia is editing the text of others in discussions for any other reason than clarity. It is especially egregious when other people's words are edited to make them appear to mean something entirely opposite to what they said, no matter how sloppily and transparently that was done. When the other person so victimized is an admin responding to your unblock request ... well ... I was undecided on this when I started writing this decline but now my mind's made up. Your talk page access will be revoked for this unconscionable breach of wikiquette. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 07:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you stating that Dxneo is your account? I have to say, I find that rather unlikely. That account was created on 2017-10-03. --Yamla (talk) 12:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You also conveniently forgot Johnthebaptism. It's very clear you are attempting to mislead us. I very strongly suggest this unblock request be declined. Ban evasion should never be rewarded. --Yamla (talk) 12:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dxneo is not my account, it never was. I don't know which other reason I could use. I don't even know Johnthebaptism as I have stated in my reason that I am using a second hand phone which possibly mean the first user of this device must've been creating all this accounts. The only accounts I'm responsible for is Nathanielbapela012 and Dxnathi other accounts I don't know about them. Looking forward to be a contributor again on Wikipedia. Dxnathi (talk) 13:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dxnathi, please do well to not implicate me in your nonsensical puppetry. I only have two accounts (Dxneo and ihateneo). dxneo (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
my bad to mention your account. Sorry, mistake has been fixed. Dxnathi (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply