Your submission at Articles for creation: DURGESH NANDAN (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Durgesh066, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DURGESH NANDAN (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DURGESH NANDAN (October 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DURGESH NANDAN (October 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Durgesh Nandan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Durgesh Nandan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA 11:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DN Aerospace edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DN Aerospace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA 11:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

  Hello, Durgesh066, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Durgesh7728 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 03:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for sel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 03:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising, self promotion, socking to avoid scrutiny.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 03:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Durgesh066 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am so sorry about my mistakes but now i really want to contibute something better to wikipedia please unblock my account and pi don't know how to delete an account. I have two accounts. Please delete one of them and i assure you i will never do this again. Please unblock me. Durgesh066 (talk) 10:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblock accepted per conditions below; Durgesh066, please be aware that you will be reblocked if issues recur. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you are unblocked, how would you go about improving this encyclopedia? Please be specific. MER-C 14:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

MER-C I am an Aeronautical engineer and I have the basic knowledge about aircraft and rockets. I will definitely upload few articles in aerospace domain.

You seem to have attempted to write an article about yourself. Would you agree to not edit about yourself or or otherwise post information related to yourself? Do you understand that when editing you would need to base your edits on what independent reliable sources state and not your own personal knowledge? Accounts cannot be deleted, but if you are unblocked, the other one will remain blocked so you can abandon it. 331dot (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

331dot Yes I agree that I will never post any irrelevant articles related to self promotion and always write any article with proof of the concept and things. And my ip is also blocked please unblock it.

Just to clarify matters in my own mind, I would say that you would need to affirm that you will not write about DN Aerospace or Durgesh Nandan in any manner, that any content you add will be cited to WP:reliable sources and that any article creation for now will be through the WP:AfC process, at least till you've had more than one article accepted by them. You would also need to describe what ares you would like to write about. Any other admin might change or reject my interpretation of how to best proceed.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am confirming that without WP:reliable sources and without WP:AfC process, I will not publish any article and I want to write about aerodynamics and aircraft designs and also about historical experiments in aerospace field.

SpacemanSpiff do you have any concerns here? 331dot (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
@331dot: He still hasn't answered Dlohcierekim's question in a straight manner, just equivocating around it. I won't be on regularly for a few more days, but if you and Dlohcierekim are convinced that the kind of spamming (see deleted contribs also) on this account and on Durgesh7728 (talk · contribs · logs) that's been going on since August last year at least won't happen again then feel free to go ahead without any response from me. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 16:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am assuring you all that this will never happen again and also will not post any self promotional article. Now please unblock my IP and my account as well. Thank you for listening my request.

@SpacemanSpiff and 331dot:@MER-C: I'm inclined to unblock under the conditions I proposed as reblocking would be easy if problems resume. However, I'm in the midst of a personal crisis and will not be able to monitor closely. I guess I need to add that socking will also be reason for an indefinite reblock. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:53, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply