Thanks for your edits

edit

Great that you started to improve financial math on Wikipedia, really nice work! Best regards Ulner (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

to DUde

edit

I really don't understand your threats and vilent language and approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillliamG (talkcontribs) 15:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm not surprised you take my comments as threats. If you can't understand why Wikipedia policies encourage inclusion of material about Steven Spielberg's latest project versus (hypothetically) your film school documentary, there's little I think I can do to educate you. So it's not surprising you'll take my words (and Ulner's) as some kind of promotion of NASDAQ (a private company, as you keep emphasizing) over a little-known one, and as some kind of combative move to keep your supposedly valuable info off Wikipedia. I suggest working on the sourcing issues. Please read the pages I linked thoroughly. AFD will be coming up in a few days. --DudeOnTheStreet (talk) 19:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

to DUde

edit

Have you ever heard of WIK : CIV ? here, especially for you : Incivility consists of personal attacks, rudeness, disrespectful comments, and aggressive behaviours that disrupt the project and lead to unproductive stress and conflict You have breached literally every word in the code, being aggressive, personal, rude etc.All I am trying to do is to build the entry properly.--WillliamG (talk) 06:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I've heard of WP:CIV. Needless to say(?), I disagree with your summary of my behavior. In my view, you have been thrashing about quite cluelessly. --DudeOnTheStreet (talk) 07:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

to DUde

edit

There you go again "thrashing cluelessly", another breech of Wikipedia code of conduct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WillliamG (talkcontribs) 15:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Don't bother posting here again. --DudeOnTheStreet (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply