Your submission at Articles for creation: Coffee Shop University (February 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ducati-2007, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Ducati-2007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of TimedText:...

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, TimedText:..., was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft titling and book notability

edit

"Draft:..." would be the title of a draft for an article titled "...". I don't suppose that you want to create this.

"Draft:Coffee Shop University by Mario Kfoury" would be the title of a draft for an article titled "Coffee Shop University by Mario Kfoury". That's not the way articles on books are titled. Even if there's an ambiguity, it's fixed in some other way. (Cf the articles Nine Stories (Salinger) and Nine Stories (Nabokov).)

The inherent significance of a book is of no concern to Wikipedia. What matters is what independent, reliable sources have already said about it on web pages or in magazines, books etc that are accessible to the public. The vast majority of published books do not have articles in Wikipedia, nor should they. -- Hoary (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Never mind Hoary when there'll be reliable sources we shall return and present another article.- Ducati-2007 (talk) 04:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)Reply