Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some useful information about Wikipedia for new editors: Wikipedia:Welcome and here's the Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(text_formatting) which explains about the use of bold for emphasis. I hope this is helpful. Best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Again, please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(text_formatting) to read about the use of emphasis in articles. Using bold the way that you are doing is against the recommendations of the Manual of Style and if you intend to edit the encyclopaedia you really ought to try to work with the existing setup. Thanks and best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 11:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible conflict of interest

edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Polycap (and Polypill also), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. I hope that this is helpful - I am assuming from what I have read that you are perhaps mentioned in the Polycap article. Thanks and best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 11:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possible conflict of interest reported

edit

Hi. I am sorry that we have not been able to communicate. I remain concerned about the possibility of a conflict of interest here. Just to keep you up to date, I have added the Conflict of Interest notice to Polypill and Polycap, and I have reported these articles at the Conflict of Interest noticeboard. You may want to visit that page to represent your point of view. I've also mentioned it to an experienced editor and admin here who is medical and I thought/hoped might be able to help, though he's busy in real life and I've not heard back from him yet. I think I've now done all I can to help both you and the encyclopaedia within my limited knowledge and abilities, so I think I'll pretty much step back and hope that someone else can get involved and help. With best wishes, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

New to Wikipedia?

edit

Hello Drmaseeh. The study reported at Polycap seems to be important, but the editorial standards of Wikipedia need to be observed. The fact that your edits have led to a complaint at the WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Polypill and Polycap is serious, and I hope that you will take the time to contribute your views there. EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply