Nomination of Sue Jelley PPSWA SPF for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue Jelley PPSWA SPF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Jelley PPSWA SPF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Tacyarg. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sue Jelley PPSWA SPF seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hi there - I'm afraid a blog is not a reliable source. Tacyarg (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Drlbm. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Flapjacktastic (talk) 16:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thank you for your welcome and list of useful information

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazel Reeves

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hazel Reeves, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Drlbm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Flapjacktastic (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, you have claimed copyright to the images of the paintings included in Sue Jelley PPSWA SPF. Unless you are Sue Jelley, it is highy unlikely that you are the copyright owner, and shouldn't claim it as "own work" either. If this is the case, then please remove the images from enwiki and ask for their deletion on Commons.

If you are Sue Jelley, then please read Wikipedia:Autobiography: writing an article about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. Fram (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Honorifics

edit

Hello! Regarding your edits at Society of Women Artists, please read the policy at WP:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Honorific_prefixes. It states that honorifics in Wikipedia's voice should not be included; styles and honorifics related to royalty are explicitly included among those that should not be included. While there are a few exceptions provided, none of them apply in the article in question. Thanks, and happy editing! PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Some baklava for you!

edit
  Have some Baklava! We are all trying to improve the wiki. Comments above appear blunt but those editors just want things fixing.

We know that its impossible for everyone to know this stuff. Have a hug. Don't give up. Victuallers (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply