Dragon guy
Why did you revert the biscuit article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennybiscuit (talk • contribs) 15:06, 23 February 2007
First of all, I can't message you back if you don't sign your post, and second, I reverted it from an article about someone's dog, which is hardly relavent to anyone but the owner of the dog and some people they know, to the original article about the food item, an article that belongs in an encyclopedia.Dragon guy 03:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, Dragon guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --WikiSlasher 07:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Which part of "Clocks" reference needs a citation? edit
In your recent edit to Daylight saving time, why do you think Coldplay's song needs a citation? The song has a Wikipedia page already. The fact that Martin is Willett's great-great grandson is already documented in the Wikipedia page for him. Eubulides 17:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Chris Martin entry already has a seemingly-reliable citation to the effect that Martin is Willett's great-great grandson. If you don't believe that citation, I Googled around and found a speech by Lord Tanslaw before the House of Lords saying the same thing. Perhaps these sources are both wrong, but it seems unlikely. The connection to Willett is what makes this cultural reference particularly apropos; I wouldn't want to omit it if it's true. Eubulides 02:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- While we're on the subject of that citation, I would like to shoehorn in a reference to the Grammy award business, as it's a nice counterpoint to Guy Lombardo's performance being #1 in 1931. It's nice to keep track of how popular a particular cultural reference is, since we need to keep pruning this section. The old text was verbose, though; I'll come up with a less-intrusive way to say it. Eubulides 02:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Dragon guy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Dragon guy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)