Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxonomic Table of Viral Species (January 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


Hi. Please see the discussion about your Table of Viruses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses#Please help a draft article at AfC where I asked for some help. One of the project members has made a very interesting suggestion to use your database at WikiData, which is one of the other Wikimedia Foundation projects that supports Wikipedia and other projects as a type of database service. Thanks for your contribution so far. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy to place the table wherever it is deemed to be most useful - I post to save future bioinformatacists the week it required for me to create it, myself. I think it truly could be useful to other scientists. What is the best means for doing so? (Sorry, it's been several years since I contributed.) DrStephenHuff (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Dodger67: Posted a query about your article on WikiProject: Viruses. Your article looks more suitable for Wikidata. We already have a List of viruses and List of virus families. Get in touch with Tobias1984. He's looking for virus related data for Wikidata to store. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
@DrStephenHuff: Hi! You couldn't have come back to Wikipedia at a better time. We are currently building a parallel database project (Wikidata) to store information for Wikipedia, and the data will also be accessible on its own. Your table looks like it has lots of great information we would like to store. If your interested in contributing to Wikidata we could work together to get the table into the database and then queries can return the whole table or parts of it, for interested scientists. You can use the same account as Wikipedia. Just head over to www.wikidata.org and we will talk there about the details. If your an bioinformatacists your going to have a lot of fun over at Wikidata :) --Tobias1984 (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Tobias1984: Tobias, I created/validated my account and WikiData and started a new item there, but I'm going to have to do a bit of research to figure out how to put the table data into the system. Perhaps you can suggest a quick link for this? DrStephenHuff (talk) 13:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
@DrStephenHuff: I replied on your Wikidata talk page. --Tobias1984 (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, DrStephenHuff! Thank you for your contributions. I am Malke 2010 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Malke 2010 (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

DrStephenHuff, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi DrStephenHuff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taxonomic Table of Viral Species

edit
 

Hello DrStephenHuff. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Taxonomic Table of Viral Species".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taxonomic Table of Viral Species}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Newton Falls, Ohio, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Seems you have a problem with sourcing and rather absurd content additions re: the above and more recently the same on the Ohio article. If you persist in such nonsense you will be blocked. Vsmith (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

It only took several weeks to catch, but you caught it. Oh, and have you ever LIVED in Ohio? I don't think the additions were so absurd.— Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStephenHuff (talkcontribs) 17:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Never been there ... and yes, they were quite absurd. Vsmith (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate the good work that you do, but the fact that you have never been there rather negates your opinion. Unhelpful, probably, but absurd? The truth IS sometimes absurd. Spend a few weeks there and then tell me what's wrong with those people - if it's not widespread contamination on the scale of the Cuyahoga River FIRE, then it can only be due to nearly ubiquitous genetic damage accrued to generation after generation of rampant inbreeding. I chose the "nice" end of the stick. Be good and be well! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.129.6.107 (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply