Image:Ubc_goddess_of_democracy.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ubc_goddess_of_democracy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jaren Cerf

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Jaren Cerf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 00:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your note (diff) on my talk page: the reason I deleted the article was because it lacked verifiable third-party sources and did not have any apparent claim of notability beyond collaborations with high-profile artists. I certainly agree that I am no expert in the field, so do feel free to re-create the article if there are good references and a solid claim to notability that can be added in the second version. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 18:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

New Message

edit
 
Hello, Dr.kwan. You have new messages at Addshore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.