Welcome edit

Hello, Dr. Susan Hardwicke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 17:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Help request edit

{{help me}}

Thank you very much! How long is required before my contribution is "live"? When I search on the name of the person I am writing about, the article doesn't appear.

I guess that you are referring to User:Dr. Susan Hardwicke/David B. Rivkin? Because that article is currently in your own userspace, it is not a live article yet, so will not appear for normal users performing a search.

Before you move it over though, there might be a few problems with the article. I will take a look, and make some comments here in a few moments.  Chzz  ►  18:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK- I won't move it until I see your message. --Dr. Susan Hardwicke (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Comments re. the article;
  • Currently it contains the code;
...office of Baker & Hostetler ([[Baker Hostetler]])...
...which displays as;

...office of Baker & Hostetler (Baker Hostetler)...

Instead, you should put this code;
...office of [[Baker Hostetler|Baker & Hostetler]]...
This will make a link from the words "Baker & Hostetler" to the article entitled "Baker Hostetler".
  • Please try to use neutral language; for example, the phrase "a prolific political writer" is not a neutral point of view - it should just be, "a political writer" - I appreciate that he has indeed written a lot, but we want the reader to make up their own mind as to the significance. It would be fine to say, "He has written over 1000 articles for mainstream media" if a direct reference from a reliable source supported this 'fact' - e.g. a newspaper, magazine article or book. There are other non-neutral phrases in the article, so please review it with this in mind; check WP:PEACOCK and WP:WEASEL.
  • There are currently no in-line references, so it is hard to verify the information; this is particularly important in the case of biographies of living persons. I will add information about how to make such references in another section of this page. Please read WP:BLP for more information on these things.
  • The (frankly huge) list of publications is not appropriate; Wikipedia is not a directory. I suggest removing the entire list, and instead writing a short paragraph explaining the extent of his writing (with references, of course).
I hope that you will find these suggestions and comments useful. I advise you to address these issues prior to making the article 'live', otherwise it is likely to be removed. Whilst it remains in your userspace, you can work on it for as long as you like.

For more help, you can either;

  • Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
  • Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
  • Talk to us live, with this or this.
Best of luck,  Chzz  ►  18:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
You have new messages
Hello, Dr. Susan Hardwicke. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

 Chzz  ►  03:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

How references work edit

Simple references edit

These require two parts;

a)
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Dr. Susan Hardwicke/reftest and try it out.

Named references edit

Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook">
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates edit

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

David B. Rivkin edit

Hi there. Some of your recent edits to David B. Rivkin were removed by another editor, and they've explained why on the article discussion page, Talk:David_B._Rivkin - I'm not forming any opinion at all as to who is right and wrong, I just ask that you please discuss things there, and do not add the facts again, before coming to an agreement with other editors - per WP:BRD. If you need any help, please ask. Cheers!  Chzz  ►  10:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Encaff_logo.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Encaff_logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Joseph J. DioGuardi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Joseph J. DioGuardi, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:51, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your behavior here is being discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#User:Dr. Susan Hardwicke - paid spammer. You will of course wish to present your point of view in this matter. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

To expand on Orangemike's warnings above (which were warranted), your edit at Talk:Joseph J. DioGuardi (seen here) changed another editor's comment, whether you intended to do so or not. That isn't allowed at Wikipedia, only under very limited circumstances are you allowed to change another person's comment at a talk page. You can read the guideline for details. The reason why this isn't allowed is because when you modify another person's comment, you make it look like they said something that they didn't actually say. If you object to what a person says, or if you have any other response, then you should type your response below their words (make sure to sign your comment by including ~~~~ at the end). -- Atama 17:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

User page edit

Hello Dr. Hardwicke, I wanted to let you know that I've blanked your page per our guideline at WP:UP#NOT. "Excessive unrelated content" is not allowed, including "inappropriate or excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia", and your user page contained what amounted to a full resume. Wikipedia is not the place for self-promotion (or promotion of any other kind). If you wish to include some simple personal information, that is certainly allowed and not uncommon, but please try to be reasonable. If you choose to reinsert such information, your userpage can be deleted as advertising. Your userpage for the most part is for you to do as you wish, and some material not related to Wikipedia is allowed, but just not to the extent that you've done before. If you have questions or need some guidance feel free to ask me. Thank you. -- Atama 16:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DavidBRivkin3.jpg edit

 

The file File:DavidBRivkin3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply