Dptalbot

Clouds

Great information about Clouds! Badagnani 15:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Dptalbot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Fornost 10:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Powderfinger

Hi! I've just reverted the adjustments you made to the Powderfinger page. I'm sorry because I know it looks like you spent a while doing all of that. I'd like to explain why I've done this. The sales amounts you've notes are extremely assumptive. An ARIA Platinum certification does indicate 70,000 units, howeverthis is inshore sales only. It doesnt take into consideration overseas sales, so the amounts are in some cases very distant to their actual sales. Internationalist, for instance, sold half again of its Australian sales overseas, however these did not affect the Australian certification.

The other main thing I see that you changed was the singles. You removed the qutation marks. The reason that they're there to begin with is because that's to do with Wikipedia's standard. Although it's in a list of singles, the expectation is that songs appear in quotation marks and all albums appear in italics while musical artists, and any people or groups for that matter, are displayed normally without quotes or alternative formatting. This is all laid out in the WP:ALBUMS project guideline in the Track listing section of the page.

Sorry to have you do all that and then for me to revert, but it didn't fit the Manual of Style.

--linca^linca 09:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I understand completely your intent to expand on the information, however I was simply explaining that the sales figures there are presumptuous. An encyclopedia provides as accurate as possibly information. If you're talking album sales and can't be more specific than "greater than" figures, the figure should sinply not be stated. A certification of sales provides this as preemptive information, making stating the actual sales applicable, but if you just "presume" the sales are whatever amount, you're doing no more than multiplying the certification by the amount of sales required to achieve the certification, which is tautology, in a sense. There's no point expanding an article if all the expansion yields in replication of data from somewhere else in the article. Unless you can find a source providing exact amounts of what the sales were (even if it's cumulative or domestic and international, that's fine.

--linca^linca 12:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry if you don't understand what I'm saying, but if what I've said already, in addition to providing you with the relevant policies, then I don't know what to advise you. All I can say is that there are some basics that are standard on Wikipedia. It's superfluous to re-iterate some information, such as explaining what record certifications are (you'll find that the ARIA definition of platinum is located on their page). Some cases it may be notable to note the exact amount of album sales, but generally, it's suitable to simply state the certification and leave it at that. As I've said before, unless you can be specific to, say, the nearest 10,000 or so units, it's not a reliable enough source to note what that amount is. It's not commonplace, but I'll accept it if you can find the amount of each and a reliable, relevant web citation for the amount. I don't know of a general warehouse for that kind of information here in Australia, but for NZ for instance, you have charts.co.nz which, though not much help for Powderinger, gives you an idea of the reliability I'm talking about. Just so you know, the Thirsty Merc debut album Thirsty Merc (album) sold 124,000 units, and this fact is echoed in the band's own website on their bio page (mind you, it states "over 120,000 domestic units", but that's by the by) but the fact is unrequired. As this is a fact that makes the album a platinum album, I've noted on their page that it is a platinum album, but have left out the amount of units sold, as its simply an unrequired fact, alike to chart figures being provided (chart trajectories are not allowed on pages unless it serves a purpose greater than simply illustrating when an album went into and out of the charts).

--linca^linca 12:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Powderfinger

You have been invited to join WikiProject Powderfinger, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Powderfinger-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in Powderfinger and/or your many edits to Powderfinger articles. If you would like to join, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User Powderfinger}} to your userpage.

G1ggy! _{Review me!} 04:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Like a Dog - Powderfinger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Like a Dog - Powderfinger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Jenny Morris portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jenny Morris portrait.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Metre - Powderfinger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Metre - Powderfinger.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Stone Roses live performances

added links pointing to Newport, Royal Court, Reading, Metro, Kawasaki, Town and Country, Century Hall, Festival Hall, Cork and Civic Hall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dptalbot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ayn Ruymen

added links pointing to Ghost Story, Visions, Police Story and Hawaii Five-O

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)