Doyleelmocollins

Welcome!

Hello, Doyleelmocollins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thos. Kent Miller, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Enfcer (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thos. Kent Miller

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thos. Kent Miller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Enfcer (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Kent Miller (November 3)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Kent Miller (November 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 14:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Doyleelmocollins, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller

Hello Doyleelmocollins. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Thomas Kent Miller".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Thomas Kent Miller (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas Kent Miller.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Thomas Kent Miller, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Doniago. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The War of the Worlds (1953 film) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There also seems to be some original research here. I would recommend including independent sources to back up the claims made in the section you added. DonIago (talk) 05:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Doniago - I went to your talk page but I see no obvious way to leave you a message. Thus I'm hoping this will get to you. I added the "Title Sequence" section to "The War of the Worlds (1953 film)" because it is a vital yet much overlooked aspect of the movie. You say that it "seems less than neutral" to you, but I don't understand. How can a description of the title sequence be anything but neutral? I merely describe the colors and "swipes and dissolves" along with mentioning that it is accompanied by a martial score, all of which "telegraphs" what to expect tonally even before the movie proper begins. These are simply facts. I'm not sure what you mean by "original research here." The title sequence is what it is; anybody who watches the film will see exactly what I've described; it would seem to me that there need not be any independent sources. In fact, I've researched and studied this movie literally since it was released in 1953; I have hundreds of articles and books and blogs all about "The War of the Worlds (1953 film)" and, trust me, if any of them had commented about the title sequence in any way, I would have noticed. Since none have, I've taken it upon myself to describe the title sequence in neutral terms. This sequence is every bit as important as any other aspect of the film. I cannot change your opinion, obviously, but I would appreciate your thinking about my reasoning above. All Best regards, Doyleelmocollins, May 29, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Thanks for your calm and measured response to my concerns! As I'm sure you've noticed, WP editors can get a bit testy sometimes. :p

Your text included descriptive terminology such as "dynamic and martial". To my mind this goes beyond strictly matter-of-fact description and into interpretation, which shouldn't be done without providing a source that's described the sequence as such. Other editors may disagree on that, and you'd be welcome to ask the question at the article's Talk page. Your saying that the sequence telegraphs what to come is definitely you applying your interpretation, IMO.

I truly appreciate that you've put such work into analyzing the sequence, but unfortunately Wikipedia editors are not in and of themselves reliable sources. Thank you for reaching out to me about your concerns, and again, I'd encourage you to broach the question at the article's Talk page if you'd like feedback from other editors. It truly is unfortunate if there's no published material regarding this opening sequence, as it does stand out (and likely stood out even more when the film was released!). Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 13:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello again, Doniago. A quick query: Would it be acceptable to you if I removed "loaded" adjectives like "dynamic" and such? The word "martial," though, is necessary as it conveys the objective nature of that particular bit of the film score. Thank you. dec

I'd have to see the text you have in mind, and would probably still feel that a source is needed to establish the significance of the sequence and back up any assertions that went beyond a literal description of what's shown (similar to a plot summary...but in this case a mere summary wouldn't establish the significance of the sequence). I'd have problems with "martial" as well, since I do think that's a matter of how we're interpreting the music rather than how an international viewer might regard it. Sorry if this isn't what you were hoping to hear. DonIago (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello again, Doniago and all the other illustrious editors of Wikipedia. Back in May 2018, Doniago deleted a section WAR OF THE WORLDS (1953) that I had included sometime earlier. The section was titled "The Title Sequence" and I argued that it should remain as it was not only unique, but it telegraphed to audiences of that era (who never would have before experienced a Technicolor war film anything like WAR OF THE WORLDS) the tone of the film. I used words like "dynamic and martial," which Doniago argued were not neutral enough. In the end, Doniago invited me to show the text to his colleagues and ask for their opinions. I'm doing just that now, a few months after our discussion. Thank you for helping making Wikipedia a great resource. All best regards. Doyleelmocollins

I couldn't find the exact edited-out text in your historical edit comparison section, so here is the text as well as I can reproduce it:

"The title sequence is one of the finest conceived. Military stenciling flashes repeatedly, hypnotically, in changing colors, fast dissolves, and swipes of various shapes, all against an unchanging black background. Following a montage of scratched footage from both World Wars showing the evolution of weaponry, accompanied by a stirring voice-over call to arms by then prominent voice-actor Paul Frees in his most solemn, adamant voice, the Leith Stevens’ impressive marshal score begins with a crash and flaring horns as “The War of the Worlds” in red military stencil lettering appears in a smash cut, rising in a mere second to fill the screen; then the lettering changes into green followed by a circular iris swipe that reveals yellow stenciling “Based on the novel by H.G. Wells”; another circular swipe reveals the cast names in green, which then flash yellow rapidly then back to green; a horizontal swipe from the left reveals in blue stencil “Screenplay by Barré Lyndon”; followed by a swipe revealing more blue lettering listing technical crew; another vertical swipe from the top with pulsating, flashing purple letters with more crew; another swipe from the top showing in flashing orange and yellow stenciling the composer and associate producer; another swipe with flashing red letters reveal the special effects artists; swipe again this time with flashing red and white letters “Produced by George Pal” right into “Directed by Byron Haskin.”

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Kent Miller (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Kent Miller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas Kent Miller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 02:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas Kent Miller concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Kent Miller, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Kent Miller

Hello, Doyleelmocollins. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Kent Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)