Tim, Thanks for the welcome. However, seems that my joining is a mistake: (1) My postings are not meant-intended to be part of a discussion; they posit my comprehension of their subjects. (2) I am not interested in serving Wikipedia as a messenger collecting published information for it, but ONLY in suggesting my own personal comprehensions. I have tens of essays positing own pesonal comprehensions of a variety of life-evolution-culture subjects. Respectfully, Dov Henis (retired,'56 Biochem PhD Un of Pittsburgh, Pgh PA USA) Dov Henis (talk) 00:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dov. It does indeed seem that your joining was a mistake. The discussion pages here are for discussion only, and the articles are for well sourced mainstream information, NOT for original research. You might like to read this page and this one too. I hope that you consider staying around and making edits according to the conventions and intentions of this encyclopedia, but otherwise, please do not introduce your own original research. This is not the place for it, and it will be removed. garik (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello Dov Henis and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have not already created a account here, note that you do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...


July 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Life are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Molecular geometry edit

Your recent edit to Molecular geometry was clearly inappropriate as it was right at the top of the article and its relevance is not clear. I have moved it to the talk page Talk:Molecular geometry, as someone might have a way of using this material appropriately. --Bduke (talk) 07:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to survival of the fittest, dark matter, and talk:faster-than-light, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2011 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Energy, you may be blocked from editing. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2012 edit

I've undone your recent addition to Astrobiology. Were you intending to add that to the discussion page (talk:Astrobiology)? Vsmith (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Wikipedia:Help desk, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Roger (talk) 09:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of particles, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 23:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply