User talk:Dough4872/Archive 2010

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Admrboltz in topic BL-80 FAC

What's next on the article list for you?

edit

Although I am not pleased with 347, we'll have to deal with it. We have Route 1 Business left in the US portion along with 9W. We have less and less state routes left: 153, 164, 1, 18N, 92 and 60. Outside of interstates and the main list, what's the plan?Mitch32(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!) 16:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am possibly thinking to keep 171 as-is and strike it. I'd also say go for 195 first. Remember this, 195 is internally the former Route 37 Freeway. When they do construction contracts for Route 195, they have to name (Route 37F) in the name as well. I will probably do the rest of the state routes, although 92 is getting more and more boring the more I have to write about it. 164 needs its history and it should be done - its still in its sandbox. 153 has a waiting sandbox still. 1 and 18N when I bother to finish it.Mitch32(A fortune in fabulous articles can be yours!) 16:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

92 done! Finally. I see the work on 195 and now 280, nice job! We're getting there slowly but surely.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 19:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC) IRC? Haven't seen you there in a while.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 19:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

IRC? Also I replaced some imagery in 53 with my newer ones. Also, great job on 676, would like to chat.Mitch32(Live from the Bob Barker Studio at CBS in Hollywood. Its Mitch!) 20:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

"When they do construction contracts for Route 195, they have to name (Route 37F) in the name as well." What? http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/capital/tcp04f/route/sec3rt195.pdf doesn't mention 37F at all. --NE2 19:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

FAC replies...

edit

I've made a few changes and replied at the FAC. Imzadi1979 (talk)

edit

Hey, just wanted to let you know that I have bent and removed the Google Maps footnotes from the article. I assume that was your major nuance from supporting at this point. Dabomb has asked that I have you respond to this discussion, if that is the case, before I renominate the article. Cheers, ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GAN of Eastern Air Lines Flight 663

edit

Hello. According to your recommendations, I've improved the article. Would you please take a look on it again? Thanks. Blodance the Seeker 16:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:MDUSbus

edit

 Template:MDUSbus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can you revisit this FLRC? The AfD for the article was closed as a keep, so the current status of the article is unclear. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

TB

edit
 
Hello, Dough4872. You have new messages at Talk:Saginaw Trail/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hummelstown

edit

Care to help me make the Hummelstown, Pennsylvania page better? The Rypcord. 05:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

U.S. Route 46

edit

The article has been reviewed for GA status and the review can be found here. It is currently on hold at WP:GAN until 3/8/2010. WTF? (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

US 322 in PA major intersections

edit

Why did you remove the table? It took me a lot of time to do it. I'm putting it back unless you can give me a good reason to remove it. Thanks.

Move it down to the Exit list section, not in the middle of the PA section.Mitch32(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.) 12:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also, we oughta have a US 322 in PA article eventually.Mitch32(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.) 12:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Join the WP:USRDCUP 2010!

edit

We're going to go ahead and try this again! The contest will begin April 1. It is a contest to encourage editors to improve teh quality of WP:USRD articles and participate in USRD. Precautions will be taken to make sure that people do not "game the system" and bring article quality down. Please sign up ASAP! Announcements regarding the contest will be made at WP:USRDCUP, Twitter, and/or IRC. --Rschen7754 06:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review query

edit

Please see my comments at Talk:Interstate 275 (Michigan). Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 359

edit

Hello! I noticed you made a few edits on the Interstate 359 article to revert to MoS. Thanks for that as I have not been very active in road pages as of late. However, if you have a couple of minutes, could you give me some thoughts on what else is needed to get this to GA status? I modeled it after the Interstate 296 article which was recently promoted to GA and is of a similar length to I-359. Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Patriarca12 (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

You did a damned good job. I can tell you that now, and I give you a lot of credit :) - Had to fix the junction list, but good job. Mitch32(Growing up with Wikipedia 1 edit at a time.) 22:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the good words. I'll tweak it a little more and then see if I can make it the first Alabama road-related GA! Patriarca12 (talk) 01:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Interstate 195 (New Jersey)

edit

The article Interstate 195 (New Jersey) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Interstate 195 (New Jersey) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Grondemar 04:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delaware Route 299

edit

Hi, just to let you know that I have placed the GA review for Delaware Route 299 on hold pending resolution of one minor issue. Regards. --Jameboy (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  I have now passed the article, good work. --Jameboy (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Old New Jersey Routes

edit

I see on the WikiProject US Roads/Shields Requests page you said if you find a photo for US 9W you would make a request. Well, this may not be what your looking for, but I found one from New York. [1]Gfoley4 (talk) 19:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

PA 45 to US 46

edit

You recently undid my revision to the article navigator in the infobox at Pennsylvania Route 45. Please advise on whatever rule or guideline requires the ridiculous navigation to US 46 from PA 45, when there is also a Pennsylvania Route 46 that currently exists in the state. PA 46 is more notable, in relation to PA 45, than US 46 which does not even currently exist in Pennsylvania, making this article navigation scheme nonsensical. If there is a US highway but no state highway of the same number (such as US 19 after PA 18), the scheme makes a little more sense. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 04:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

PA 653 Truck

edit

I see you've replaced the bad information. First, do you have a source for "The highway was created to bypass a narrow bridge over Coxes Creek"? It could have been a wide weak bridge, or a narrow roadway leading up to the bridge, or several other things. Also, I don't have the ADC map, but the Google Maps source you added shows Garrett Road, not Gebhart Road. Google also shows a length of 1.4 miles, a far cry from one mile on each roadway. Finally, Google is unclear about whether the name is Water Level Road or Main Street (the former might also continue into Rockwood); perhaps the PennDOT videolog would be a better source (as the roads are state-maintained quadrant routes). Please be more careful with sources. --NE2 19:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. There's still no source for the bridge being the reason for the truck bypass; for instance trucks may be banned from congested areas (doesn't apply here) or narrow roads. --NE2 01:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

U.S. Route 30 in Iowa

edit

Hello, I see you nominated U.S. Route 30 in Iowa to GA, but you forgot to put a {{good article}} on the article. I have some fun putting |oldid parametre on the GAs template on the discussion pages, so I hope you will do that too. Christian75 (talk) 20:09, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I just stumbled upon the Lincoln highway page and saw your edit. Thanks for Bannered routes. I also saw you edited the Rt. 35 and 36 pages. BTW, I live at the intersection of those two roads in Eatontown. Major construction going on there. It used to be circle, up until late 80's. Ttoclad (talk) 15:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

973 (New Jersey bus) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 978 (New Jersey bus). Since you had some involvement with the 978 (New Jersey bus) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 00:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter

edit
Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 02:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pennsylvania Route 232

edit

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for GA status. Good luck. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 16:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I will fail it if you do not respond to concerns by September 6. ~EDDY (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 00:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

PA 263

edit

Congrats! Pennsylvania Route 263 passed GA review. --Ishtar456 (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

edit

  Thank you! Your review helped Capitol Loop pass its FAC. Imzadi 1979  00:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

A1 (Croatia)

edit

Hi! I have posted A1 (Croatia) article for hwy peer review as I'd like to improve it sufficiently for GAN at least. I saw you reviewed similar articles before so could you please review this one as well. Thanks--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pulaski Skyway

edit

As there is a discussion regarding how to define the Pulaski Skyway in light of contradictory information and opinions your input would be appreciated Djflem (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Picture PR

edit

Since you commented at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/M-15 centerline 1917, you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Picture peer review/M-15 centerline 1917. Imzadi 1979  22:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter

edit
Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possible incorrect procedure

edit

Hi Dough. I am suggesting that your announcement of a move proposal for Dover does not comply with the instructions at WP:MOVEand therefore a maximum exposure of the proposed move has not been possible. The proposal may therefore be procedurally invalid.--Kudpung (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

A Little Help

edit

Hello Dough4872. I would like to know if there are any suggestions that you can tell me to make to Pennsylvania Route 731. Mjkline (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Working Man's Barnstar

edit
  The Working Man's Barnstar
Thank you for your hard work destubbing Nebraska!
Admrboltz (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
This barnstar is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by accepting it.

Happy Birthday!

edit

GA Reviews

edit

Thank you for reviewing Virginia Route 27. In the future, I suggest that you at least drop the nominator a message on his/her talk page when starting or finishing a review, so that the nominator can follow your actions. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Old Lincoln Highway

edit

I'm not sure I agree with your decision to make the page a redirect to Lincoln Highway, but it's not my pet project, and I'm not going to fight it. However, it would be nice if you would clean up Lincoln Highway to reflect the change you made to Old Lincoln Highway. Argyriou (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Red Line

edit

Thank you for the review and the helpful comments. I am a bit puzzled as to why you did not put the review on hold to give the editors a chance to meet your criticisms. However, we will address your concerns and renominate. Racepacket (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why did you remove the highway shields?

edit

Dough: I see that in the article List of Canada – United States border crossings, you removed the highway shields that I had included in the table of junctions with Canadian highways. What was your rationale for doing this? Wbaron (talk) 01:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ho ho ho

edit

BL-80 FAC

edit

Can you strike your completed comments? --Admrboltz (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply