Dooooot

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Berryessa, San Jose, California. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For Dooooot, who worked tirelessly to prove various rules of inference and replacement :) Dooooot (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Giving yourself barnstars is not on. I can't tell if you gave it to yourself, but you did sign it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hypothetical syllogism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Material equivalence, etc.

"Material equivalence" and "Material conditional" are not _rules_; I've cleaned up those article to take care of that.

"Biconditional introduction" and "Biconditional elimination" (or "Equivalence introduction" and "Equivalence elimination") are rules. You had them there before, but then redirected. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I also question whether your "proofs" are constructive (pun intended); you have to choose a basic set of rules to "prove" other rules which are considered basic by different logicians or philosophers. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, your use of "material implication" as a rule (in your proofs) is not supported by any text in Wikipedia; you should relink it as material implication (rule) or create an appropriate article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Greetings Dooot,

I think you have been making great contributions. I did move that link on the template to Material implication. Since there are two different names we should just claim the namespace as a way of making a distinction. Since you were the primary author of that content, I would invite you to move it there before I do. Greg Bard (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC) P.S. I have to apologize. I forgot that I had moved the contents to material implication (rule of inference), and forgot to mention it to you.GB

Proofs

See WT:MATH#Proofs by Dooooot. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi Dooooot. This is to remind you that messages like these are considered rude and inappropriate. Comment on the content, not the editor. Users who continue to violate Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks may have their editing privileges revoked. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 19:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	yay Iluvplanes (talk) 22:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)