Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Al Jolson. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Celithemis 11:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Rocky, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Rocky. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 15:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
First, if you need to contact me, just click the "contact me" link and it will take you to my talk page. Meaning, you added a comment to my "user page" and not my "user talk page", inadvertantly deleting information for the former. Second, those movies were not racist, and I've never read any criticism of them being racist. It's original research at heart, but at face value it's just nonsense, and known nonsense is considered vandalism. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 11:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Considering I've looked at your contributions, since registering, and you've been adding nonsense throughout Wikipedia, and blanking content (which you were warned already for), I think I'll keep my original opinion that you were adding nonsense. If you have no source to back it up (btw, the police wouldn't investigate a movie for being racist, being racist is not illegal. If you don't know, the KKK are still alive and well, and conducting meetings) then I have to assume that you either made it up or are too lazy to find the source. Either way, it is not my responsibility to find sources for you, not saying that you wanted me to, and unsourced information may be removed on site if wished. Again, I also repeat that you should respond to my talk page, not my user page. Click the "contact me" link next to my name and scroll down the page to the section titled "Rocky" if you wish to respond in the future. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Being in a group that is racist is not illegal. Performing illegal acts based on racism is illegal. Someone's personal beliefs, whether racist or not, are their beliefs and not punishable by law. So, you're right, I'm not familiar with "British" Law, but over here it isn't illegal to hate a group of people. It is illegal to use that opinion to discriminate against people. The KKK still have members and still meet, and still rally please read here. Also, if you are going to claim to be a Law student, at least show the intelligence involved in said trait to read the 5 pillars of Wikipedia which you obviously have not. Also, I don't believe you are who you claim to be because again, after twice being told the correct way to do things, you have responded to my user page and not my talk page. From here on out, if you wish to continue this conversation, respond to my talk page. If you respond to my user page, and delete or replace anything again, I will remove it immediately without bothering to ever read it. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
BTW, are you aware of what Uncle Tom is? Obviously you aren't, otherwise you wouldn't have said it. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
A tag has been placed on Louis Law, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 12:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Louis, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Turlo Lomon 12:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Turlo Lomon 12:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Bignole. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Bignole, you will be blocked from editing. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Rocky, you will be blocked from editing. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
You know, there is a simple "undo" button that let's me revert things on command, so whatever you do to my page is easily fixed with the click of a button. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I am sorry, but I have to agree with Bignole in this. Your behavior is very unprofessional, and you should consider yourself rather fortunate that Bignole is not reporting you; many others would have, and an admin would have blocked you almost immediately. I suggest you take his advice and spend some time familiarizing yourself with how we do things in Wikipedia. As well, the way to sign your name is to put four ~ one right after the other, or use the "Sign your username" button below (you will see it on your edit window).
This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Rocky, you will be blocked from editing. TedFrank 14:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Yossiea(talk) 14:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Rlevse 14:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I tried to warn you that this would happen. Unfortunately, you didn't listen. While you take this enforced vacation from Wikipedia, please consider the bahavior that helped to get you blocked. If you continue making the sorts of disruptive edits that you have, the next time you are blocked will be for much longer, perhaps indefinitely. You IP address will be logged, and any new accounts with that IP address will also be blocked. If you were just having a bad day or whatever, use this time off to find a way to get into the correct fram of mind for editing in WP. I am sorry that this happened to you, but you did have numerous chances to step away and let yourself cool off. Arcayne 18:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
