User talk:Donald Albury/Archive 17

Archive 10 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 26

 
January and February 2024—Issue 026


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Alpine ibex by LittleJerry
  Markham's storm petrel by FunkMonk, Jens Lallensack, and Therapyisgood
  List of primates by PresN
  List of birds of Alberta by grungaloo
  Rice by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by RecycledPixels
  Barley by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Bruxton
  Chicken by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by DocZach
  Cereal by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Bruxton
  Ant mimicry by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by AryKun
  Anopheles by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by AryKun
  Mosquito by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by 20 upper
  Cherry blossom by Reconrabbit, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Sei whale by 20 upper, reviewed by grungaloo
  Megaherbivore by 20 upper, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Brown bear by 20 upper, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Indian rhinoceros by 20 upper, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Hypericum hircinum by Fritzmann2002, reviewed by grungaloo
  Hypericum foliosum by Fritzmann2002, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Hypericum grandifolium by Fritzmann2002, reviewed by Esculenta
  Boquila by Etriusus, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Aptostichus barackobamai by Etriusus, reviewed by Esculenta
  Crassispira incrassata by Etriusus, reviewed by 20 upper
  Punctelia by Esculenta, reviewed by Ealdgyth
  Chrysothrix chlorina by Esculenta, reviewed by Ealdgyth
  Chrysothrix chlorina by Esculenta, reviewed by Ealdgyth
  Ramalina peruviana by Esculenta, reviewed by Ealdgyth
  Menemerus animatus by simongraham, reviewed by Esculenta
  Afraflacilla braunsi by simongraham, reviewed by grungaloo
  Nasutoceratops by FunkMonk, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Pseudastacus by Olmagon, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Angustidontus by Super Dromaeosaurus and Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Amitchell125
  Pruemopterus by Super Dromaeosaurus and Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Etriusus
  Black-billed magpie by grungaloo, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Black-capped chickadee by grungaloo, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Horned sungem by Jens Lallensack, reviewed by grungaloo
  Flaco (owl) by Rhododendrites, reviewed by Etriusus
  Telonemia by Snotoleks, reviewed by Esculenta
  "Pliosaurus" andrewsi by Amirani1746, reviewed by grungaloo
  Beaver drop by Lightburst, reviewed by Chiswick Chap

Newly nominated content

  Horned sungem by Jens Lallensack
  Tufted jay by grungaloo
  Nasutoceratops by FunkMonk
  Maize by Chiswick Chap
  Cattle by Chiswick Chap
  Pig by Chiswick Chap
  Domestic duck by Chiswick Chap
  Eusociality by Chiswick Chap
  Fish by Chiswick Chap
  Barnacle by Chiswick Chap
  Ochrophyte by Snotoleks
  Parvilucifera by Snotoleks
  Thalattoarchon by Amirani1746
  Hydropunctaria amphibia by Esculenta
  Melanohalea by Esculenta
  Spot test (lichen) by Esculenta
  Lecideaceae by Esculenta
  Hypericum × inodorum by Fritzmann2002
  Hypericum sect. Androsaemum by Fritzmann2002
  Olga Hartman by Viriditas
  Mixtotherium by PrimalMustelid
  Enhydriodon by PrimalMustelid
  Lentinus brumalis by Зэгс ус

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

Potential sock?

Hey there, Donald. I'm not sure about this, but can you check to see if the user User:GymratW is a sock of User:Becausewhynothuh?? This user certainly might be having a WP:COI with the city articles and is changing the images. If you don't have time, then I'll ask another checkuser. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I've set up a SPI on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Becausewhynothuh?. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
@NoobThreePointOh: Sorry, I am not a checkuser. Donald Albury 15:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
@Donald Albury Oh, I was looking at your user groups and saw the checkuser permission in there. Ok. Thanks for letting me know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Where did you see that? It isn't here. I had checkuser while I was on ArbCom, but I never learned how to use it, and it was removed when I resigned. If something is showing me with CU, I need to get it changed. Donald Albury 16:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
@Donald Albury Well, it was showing in your user group page. I was a little confused, since it still showed you as a checkuser. Yeah, you might want to remove the checkuser permission from that page. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
That shows that I had check user in November 2022 when I removed autopatrolled from my rights. I cannot add or remove checkuser from my own rights, and check user, as well as oversight, were removed 1 January 2023, as recorded here. Donald Albury 16:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Ah. Ok. All right then. Thanks for letting me know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

Flatworms

Regarding the article about flatworms. The taxobox for Acoelomorpha clearly says it is a subphylum in the phylum Xenacoelomorpha. And in the article for Xenacoelomorpha, the article says "The clade (groupings of organisms based on their most recent shared/common ancestors) Xenacoelomorpha groups the Acoelomorpha and the genus Xenoturbella, due to molecular studies". So it is really mentioned in the Xenacoelomorpha article. 178.232.173.10 (talk) 03:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


COI declaration

Thank you for this detailed declaration, but in the final entry you note "I was stationed there 1978–1969" - I think you might have either a transposition or typo. Thryduulf (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Oops, Donald Albury 22:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Cape Romano revert

Hi there. In regards to the revert of my edits to Cape Romano, what makes a local news source unreliable? I have seen many instances of Wikipedia routinely drawing from them for information. The source in question had direct photographs of the info. Also, was a full revert entirely necessary, as opposed to a corrective edit? The picture of the pyramid house, for instance, met the requirements. SavagePanda845 (talk) 09:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

Greetings Fellow Miamian

Thanks for correctly ordering and simplifying my homestead edit. I read your page and noticed your also a native Miamian, you have inspired me to also start contributing to the WikiProject Florida as well. Thank you for all your contributions and sharing your knowledge and history of south florida! Origenous (talk) 01:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Liberia local name

Hi, regarding the Liberia article, I only added a local name of the country. You can find this at: https://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/v#/nqo/T_Africa/ Oreen.yousuf (talk) 00:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Nyttend
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  Nihonjoe
 

  CheckUser changes

  Joe Roe

  Oversight changes

  GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27

 
March and April 2024—Issue 027


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Horned sungem by Jens Lallensack
  Tufted jay by grungaloo
  Pseudastacus by Olmagon
  List of erinaceids by PresN
  Primates by PresN
  Hypericum sect. Androsaemum by Fritzmann2002
  Thalattoarchon by Amirani1746, reviewed by Esculenta
  Lentinus brumalis by Зэгс ус, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Hypericum sect. Androsaemum by Fritzmann2002, reviewed by Maxim Masiutin
  Hypericum × inodorum by Fritzmann2002, reviewed by AryKun
  Barnacle by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Lightburst
  Maize by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by AryKun
  Pig by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Wolverine XI
  Orange (fruit) by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by 750h+
  Fish by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Reconrabbit
  Organism by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Esculenta
  Hydropunctaria amphibia by Esculenta, reviewed by AryKun
  Melanohalea by Esculenta, reviewed by AryKun
  Lecideaceae by Esculenta, reviewed by Wolverine XI
  Xylopsora canopeorum by Esculenta, reviewed by AryKun
  Spot test (lichen) by Esculenta, reviewed by AryKun
  Gustaf Einar Du Rietz by Esculenta, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Allocalicium by Esculenta, reviewed by Simongraham
  Multiclavula mucida by Esculenta, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Aphaena submaculata by Etriusus, reviewed by Wolverine XI
  White-tailed jay by Grungaloo, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Fork-tailed drongo by The Blue Rider, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Northern green anaconda by Chaotic Enby, reviewed by Geardona
  Heptamegacanthus by Mattximus, reviewed by Esculenta
  Mixtotherium by PrimalMustelid, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Diplobune by PrimalMustelid, reviewed by Wolverine XI
  Ochrophyte by Snoteleks, reviewed by Ealdgyth
  Parvilucifera by Snoteleks, reviewed by Fritzmann2002
  Urceolus by Snoteleks, reviewed by Fritzmann2002
  Plexippoides regius by Simongraham, reviewed by Grungaloo
  Olga Hartman by Viriditas, reviewed by Lightburst
  Giant panda by Wolverine XI, reviewed by Thebiguglyalien
  Enchylium conglomeratum by Xkalponik, reviewed by Wolverine XI

Newly nominated content

  Great cuckoo-dove by AryKun
  Heptamegacanthus by Mattximus
  List of talpids by PresN
  List of birds of New Brunswick by B3251
  List of forest-inventory conifers in Canada by Dank
  Dissoderma odoratum by NotAGenious
  Xiphodon by PrimalMustelid
  Banana by Chiswick Chap
  Phintella parva by Simongraham
  Evarcha maculata by Simongraham
  Asian elephant by Wolverine XI
  Megafauna by Wolverine XI
  Fishing cat by Wolverine XI
  Thistle tortoise beetle by Justinxuje
  Enchylium limosum by Xkalponik
  Enchylium polycarpon by Xkalponik
  Skeleton panda sea squirt by Chaotic Enby
  Hypericum aciferum by Fritzmann2002
  Hypericum russeggeri by Fritzmann2002
  Hypericum minutum by Fritzmann2002
  Chrompodellid by Snoteleks
  Aquilegia sibirica by Pbritti
  Carabus japonicus by NHanselman
  Charles De Geer by Yakikaki
  Cheetah reintroduction in India by Magentic Manifestations

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

Elephant

Any ideas? Can't we prune, not wholesale revert? Zenon.Lach (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Image galleries

Could you please comment on User_talk:4throck#Image_galleries about the reverts to Lunar Prospector and Diogo Cão ? Cheers, 4throck (talk) 08:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Fair Assessment

Donald, would you take a look at this draft and see if it's ready to publish. Just need a fair assessment and I've seen you an the River Wikiproject. --ARoseWolf 13:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

@ARoseWolf: Well, I certainly have published articles about rivers that were shorter and less well sourced (several were sourced to a single book). I will recommend putting the second source in {{Cite web}}, but that's a gnomish thing. I appreciate how hard it can be to find reliable sources about lesser-known rivers, and have often relied on government reports. So, yeah, I'll say it is ready. Donald Albury 16:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the assessment. It was very hard for this one in particular. I know so much personally about the river, I'll leave it at that, but I had to suppress what I know about it and only summarize what could be found in the sources. I truly am mesmerized by the editors that create GA's and FA's. Such hard work and dedication should be admired. --ARoseWolf 16:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Keeping personal knowledge out of articles can be hard. I have slipped up a few times, although, I hope, not recently. I have occasionally though about trying to take an article to FA, but my attention span on a particular article falters after a week or two, and there are always so many other topics that need attention. Donald Albury 17:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
I believe I modified the source right. If you are busy you don't have to look. I appreciate your perspective on it. I have made countless mistakes in editing. My attention span is very short. It's funny because when I do a task around the house I get super focused and can complete it but there is so much eye candy on Wikipedia. I swear I look a child on its first birthday sinking teeth into icing covered cake. We all have seen those videos. lol Thanks again, and anytime you need help or some encouragement to get that FA off the ground I think I give great pep talks. :) --ARoseWolf 17:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
It looks fine to me. Donald Albury 17:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, now I'm off to finish Haines State Forest and The Mescalero Sands of New Mexico which I promised to get done years ago. I hate research. lol <<Deep Breath>> Wish me luck. --ARoseWolf 18:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Good luck! Donald Albury 18:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Coosa Chiefdom Rewrite

@Donald Albury: Given the general structural and citation issues in the article for the Coosa chiefdom, I have been working on a rewrite. At this point, I don't think its complete, but I wanted to ask you to take a look. Thank you for your time. --KiwiNova (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

I think that looks pretty good. An article with a topic adjacent to yours that I worked on is Apalachicola Province. I think there is a lot of room in WP for improvements to coverage of the proto-historical/early historic period in the southeastern U.S. I previously kept myself busy sticking mainly to topics related to Florida, but that area spills over into the wider souteast. I have been disappointed in how limited much coverage of Native Americans in the southeastern U.S. is in WP. Something I don't see much coverage is how Mississippian chiefdoms evolved into local confederacies, and then merged into the Muscogee Confederacy. Oh, yeah, take a look at Tribal town if you haven't seen it. Donald Albury 23:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards
 

  Bureaucrat changes

 
 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 June 2024

Robinson Springs

A Robinson Springs is noted in historical sources four miles northwest of Marianna "florida"&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&ovdme=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBi6Gf-sqGAxXifDABHXUqD4MQ6AF6BAgLEAM per here but I can't find any trace of what became of it? It is noted here also. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

@FloridaArmy: Sorry, I don't see anything. There may be something in a local source that hasn't been uploaded to the net, but, aside from an historical society in Jackson County, I don't know where to look. Donald Albury 20:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for checking for me. Much appreciated. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Robert (doll) Edit Assist/Advice

Hi Donald,

No need to introduce myself as you have recently blocked my profile from editing Robert (doll). Robert's page is still outdated with information that is not totally accurate.

I'd like to update his page still but cannot risk being blocked again.

As an Admin, can you please inform me as to what was the issue with my most recent update to his page?

I'd like to come to a solution so Robert's page can be updated accordingly.

Thanks~~~ Gabriellemcnell (talk) 20:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

@Gabriellemcnell: I recommend that you propose any changes to the article on its talk page, and see what other editors say about your proposals. Donald Albury 20:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Belle Glade, Florida

Hello Donald! I saw your comment on my talk page about reverting the changes I made to the Belle Glade page. Wikipedia's general guideline on reliable sources suggests that publications from reputable organizations, which would include government agencies are considered reliable resources. I cited the Belle Glades Gov website which should be considered a reliable source. I want to hear you out, but I think we can revert the changes I made with some exceptions. Let's talk before I undo your changes. MoisesM12 (talk) 00:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

@Moises M12: Reliability of sources is contingent on what the source is being used for. A local government source is generally considered reliable for content about that government. Not so much so for the history of the area before that government existed. Archaeological and historical sources published by academic presses and journals trump histories published on the web by local governments, chambers of commerce, and similar sources. Note that our article on Calusa states, At the time of European contact in the 16th and 17th centuries, the historic Calusa were the people of the Caloosahatchee culture. They developed a complex culture based on estuarine fisheries rather than agriculture. Calusa territory reached from Charlotte Harbor to Cape Sable, all of present-day Charlotte, Lee, and Collier counties, and may have included the Florida Keys at times. There is no indication in currently accepted scholarly treatment of the Calusa that they were ever resident in Palm Beach County. The people living around Lake Okeechobee when the Spanish arrived in Florida were likely the Mayaimi. A century ago many sources stated that the Calusa extended over musch of southern Florida, but more recent scholarship has restricted their culture to southwest Florida, although their political influence may have extended further. Donald Albury 00:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

@MoisesM12: Repining with correct name. - Donald Albury 00:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Political views Kenneth Griffin

Hi Donald. I noticed your participation in Wikipedia:WikiProject Miami and was hoping that you would be interested in taking a look at an edit request I recently posted at Talk:Kenneth C. Griffin#Additions to Political views. I would be grateful if you were able to implement those edits. Thanks, Cduffymul (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Since you're already involved in the discussion...

Could you please weigh in on whether or not this is an appropriate action given the stated intent of the nomination? Note that the nom is the author of the article, intends to create 20k articles of that type, has consistently expressed opposition and hostility to attempts at restricting mass-creation of such articles, and given their extensive involvement in the topic and what has already been stated about these AfD outcomes in the thread, should know exactly how their AfD is going to turn out (so it's disingenuous to frame it as a "test case" that's supposed to influence the current discussion as if they're agnostic and as if they genuinely believe the article should be deleted). JoelleJay (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Florida resource

I have noticed and enjoyed your contributions on Florida historical topics (such as fishing ranchos) so just wanted to flag this 1860 Florida map image I recently uploaded from NARA. No idea if it's of any value but just wanted to put it on your radar.

File:Map_of_Florida_Representing_the_Several_Land_Districts,_from_the_Surveyor_General's_Report_1860_NAID_26465548.jpg

Cheers and keep up the good work! jengod (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

There are a number of good sources for old maps of Florida. I have used several from Florida Memory Maps for articles in Wikipedia. Other sources include UF Map & Imagery Library Collections and Exploring Florida Maps from USF. Donald Albury 11:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Micronation | better sourcing

Hi, I'm fairly new to wikipedia and you critiqued my sourcing I was planning on editing/correcting them but before I do so I wanted to ask your advise on better citation, most relevantly on the Micronation page; I was hoping you could mentor me on this since my official Wikipedia mentor appears to be absent or inactive. For a few citation errors I can see I made for myself such as the wrong placement for the reference to the fictional country of Ruritania(I placed the reference next to the wrong Ruritania tag), but others are less clear such as Aynvaul being *listed* as attending MicroCon in 2017 where I cited a list of attending members. I see the issue with springer were it mentions them and their location as being a minute mention, but this one I feel would warrant just a mention if it is an attendance list? (correct me if I am wrong). As for the others you mentioned (full citation needed) that they need a more specific citation, these other ones are interviews by Vice and PBS(?) I imagine timestamped links instead of links to the interviews? Furthermore how would I be more specific for references that would satisfy the full citation for website references? -Thank you for your time! ScholarGray13 (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

@ScholarGray13: I am copying this over to Talk:Micronation, where other editors who contribute to the article can see it and comment, if they wish. Let us carry on the conversation there. - Donald Albury 19:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 
 

  Technical news

  Miscellaneous


Senior Wikipedians

WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older has been inactive for some time. The following three proposals may help invigorate this project.

  1. Change the name of this project to WikiProject Senior Wikipedians.[a]
  2. Open membership in this project to users who are at least 60 years of age and have made at least 50 edits in the past year.[b]
  3. Open supporting membership in this project to users who are less than 60 years old but have made at least 50 edits in the past year and support the goals of this project.[c]

Suggested goals for this project:

  1. To support collaboration and communication among members for the advancement and improvement of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.
  2. To encourage older people, retired people, and soon-to-be-retired people to participate in Wikipedia both for the advancement of the encyclopedia and for their own personal enjoyment.
  3. To encourage older people to share their experience and expertise for the improvement of Wikipedia.
  4. To encourage older users to use their experience and expertise to help younger and less experienced users.
  5. To encourage participation in local and regional Wikimedia events.
  6. To sponsor Wikipedia meetings and classes at places where older people gather.
  7. To advocate for the elimination of ageism and sexism in Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.

Notes

  1. ^ The current name of this project, WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older, is somewhat cumbersome and excludes participation by any users under the age of 70 years.
  2. ^ This current minimum age limit of this project is 70 years. A minimum age limit of 60 years should permit the participation of most retired users. The minimum activity level of 50 edits per year is arbitrary. A minimum activity level indicates continued interest. Members who do not meet the minimum activity level shall be moved to inactive status. Members who have died shall be moved to memorial status.
  3. ^ A new class of Supporting Members allows those users under 60 years to support the goals of the project. Users approaching the age of 60 years may wish to become supporting members in anticipation of reaching the minimum age limit for members.

Please add your suggestions for this project at Senior Wikipedians. Thank you,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 01:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

If you don't wish to receive any further information about Senior Wikipedians, please remove your username from our notice list. Thanks.

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

Comment from 69.159.70.172

Donald Albury -

Sir - Why do none of you supposed ' administrators ' ever do any proper checking yourself - ??? -

If you had a ctually read KARL WALLENDA page down to bottom you would see references to what you say is missing - ?!?!?-

Please try to do some work yourself and not always relay on all of the additions from people who only enter proper / right / correct data - US - !!! -

You must be well aware at you advanced senior age ( we appear to be older than you are from your bad photo ) where there are many areas where no ' reference ' is now available this many years after the fact or can be attested to / found anymore -

It is only in recent years where Wikipedia has ' demanded ' this which is downright dumb / stupid / wrong to expect people to provide -

More than 70 % of what appears on most Wikipedia pages show no reference - !!! -

However, what you seek is right in front of you on KARL WALLENDA page at end - ???-

We knew him having worked with RBB&B Circus over time and guarantee all which was added is absolutely correct -

Therefore, please now restore our addition as entered -

Thank You Very Much -

- 69.159.70.172 - 69.159.70.172 (talk) 15:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC) -

Responded on IPs talk page. - Donald Albury 17:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Douglass

Thank you for the correction. Shipsview (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
 
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Isabelle Belato
 

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno
 

  CheckUser changes

  Barkeep49

  Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration


List of fossil sites up for deletion

I would like to see your thoughts on the deletion proposal for this list: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossil sites.

Also, if you know how to find the archive of the responses to the previous deletion proposal (circa 2017?), I would appreciate any help locating it. Elriana (talk) 06:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@Elriana: I see two old proposals to merge this into other articles, in 2008, and in 2010. I do not see any prior page for an AfD for this article, nor any notice of an AfD in 2017 in the page histories of the article page or this talk page. A search for "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossil sites" finds only the current AfD, so it does not look like any formal AfD has been previously proposed for this article. - Donald Albury 13:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. That’s really weird. I can see where I might have mistaken the merge discussion for a deletion discussion, since I was mostly reading them to find previous criticisms. But I really thought one of the discussions was more recent than that. Elriana (talk) 05:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)