Domenic antonin scalia fammartino

August 2016

Wikipedia is not a free web space for hosting personal web pages unrelated to work for the encyclopaedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

If you persist in misusing Wikipedia as you have been doing, you will be blocked, *and* you will lose access to your talk page. Please don't restore the content you added. Talk pages are for discussing improvements to Wikipedia content, Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for posting personal essays. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

I warned you in my comment above, but you failed to heed it. So:

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 ~Amatulić (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)