Shaddapology edit

Hi there Dolcej. I assume that these articles are by you, about you. Do you have any external references to verify the content? Without third-party verification, the content isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. For more information, check out the Wikipedia:Verifiability page. Thanks. --Alan Au 05:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dolcej. I'm afraid I put my two cents in on your Shaddapology page as well. But I didn't want to chase you away... an AfD is a bit of an abrupt welcome to Wikipedia - but you should stick around, there is some cool stuff here, and the place can always use someone with writing skills. Check out Scientology controversy if you're interested. Cheers. --Bookandcoffee 07:09, 4 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. edit

Hi Joe,

I'm sorry, I shouldn't have made that comment. It was wrong of me.

And I did like the song.

You are the Joe Dolce, aren't you?

If so, it's odd finding you here - that song is part of my pre-computer life, which is so long ago and so totally distinct from the present.

It's like moving to a foreign city and finding out that you still have the same next door neighbour.

I was thinking about being a one-hit-wonder (which is one hit more than most will ever have.)

It must be hard to move on.

Edmund Hillary did. What else could be bigger than Everest? Nothing, so he went and did good works for the sherpas and so much else.

Roald Amundsen didn't. After both poles were conquered, he pretty much lost purpose, at least according to some accounts.

Either way, good luck in your ventures. Ben Aveling 22:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:JnJ.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:JnJ.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008 edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Linvanhek.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Linvanhek.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Joebush.JPG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joebush.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:52, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:DW1.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DW1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Shaddapology.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shaddapology.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Linshot.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Linshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Have a cookie edit

 
Stuart.Jamieson has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

|

Joe, didn't realise you had a WP account - During our campaign last year, you were making edits as an I.P. - If there's anything I can do to help improve articles you're working on, feel free to let me know. All the best, Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 06:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Linvanhek2011.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Linvanhek2011.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Difficult Women edit

 

The article Difficult Women has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm unable to find substantial secondary source coverage to indicate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)Reply