Dohodho

June 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Chesky, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Amccann421 (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

What the hell is wrong with you? I left an edit summary. Dohodho (talk) 23:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Dohodho, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dohodho! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Talk page guidelines

Dohodho, Zigzig20s has asked you a couple of times already to stop posting on their talk page. If you post there again, I will block you temporarily for harassment. Solve your problem differently. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

? I'm trying to communicate with them about this issue. So I can't 1) discuss the issue and 2) revert on the page. Then what am I supposed to do exactly? BTW, can you resolve this by reverting the incorrect claim out of Chesky's article? It's ridiculous and obviously violates BLP. Dohodho (talk) 23:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

You can't badger someone into answering your question. This was a matter for the article talk page to begin with. Drmies (talk) 23:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for removing it, although the category "American Jews" is still there. Dohodho (talk) 23:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

And yes, you can't break 3R (well you can but you might be blocked) even if you're right, to answer the question you left on my talk page. As I indicated elsewhere, WP:BLPN is a good place to bring this up; a discussion on the actual source/article is best placed on WP:RSN. You may not get your way immediately, you may not get it at all, but discussion is not "banned" or anything like that. As it happens I think I agree with you on the substance and, being an admin, I will act accordingly to protect the BLP, but I have to tell you that you are better off going about it a different way. Happy editing, and I'm glad I didn't have to block you. Zigzig20s will join the discussion elsewhere, maybe; if not, their voice won't be heard. Drmies (talk) 23:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)