Dogbones156
November 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Tnxman307, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 18:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Dogbones156 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I believe the article "ChobbieWorld" should be unblocked, I am aware that I was trying to "advertise" as administrators told me, although I made a page User:Dogbones156/sandbox and well I made a draft saying about the article, administrator 'Tnxman307" told me to make it, so we can furtherly discuss this situation about the undeleted, he told me to delete various paragraphs (such as the external links and pricing which appeared to be adversiting, unfortuenatly he said I have no "third-party media links such as the news media" now I don't know what to do, I do not even know how to garner attention from such a huge corporation as the news, all I want is the article "ChobbieWorld" reopened, I respectfully understand any error.
Decline reason:
User is not blocked. See my further comments, below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Let's back up a bit, here. The {{unblock}} template is for editors whose accounts have been blocked from editing, as with editors who vandalize articles or are otherwise disruptive. Your account is not one of those; you can edit as you wish. So I've declined the request, above, because I can take no action to unblock you. Looking at ChobbieWorld, it was protected because it was recreated 4 times in the span of a few hours, each time being deleted. Your first step to getting the title unprotected would be to talk to Tnxman307 directly, since he/she has interacted with you before on this issue. If you want broader consensus, other editors can step in and have a look. But the critical bit, here, is that we need something from a reliable source independent of the subject to support the facts in the article. It looks like a new game, so perhaps there will be some coverage upon its release? Hope this helps - and feel free to use the {{helpme}} tag for additional assistance, rather than the {{unblock}} - you've done nothing wrong, here, and good work on following up with the draft of the article. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)