User talk:Dodger67/Archive 24
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Dodger67. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | → | Archive 28 |
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Rebekah Marine draft
Hi again, I've done more work on my draft of Rebekah Marine, and I was wondering if you'd mind taking a look at it. I think I've done enough to establish notability (?) but the article is still a bit rough. Thanks again! ChristianCanCook (talk) 09:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI Dodger67/Archive 24,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey! we are working on that page. the new opening will be there in 4 minutes. Lots of disabled people editing so takes us longer :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cattos12 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Cattos12 is this part of an organized editathon? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
YES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cattos12 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Your draft article, Draft:South African National Editors' Forum
Hello, Dodger67. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South African National Editors' Forum".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Articulatory setting
Sir! Peter Roach having written in English Phonetics and Phonology that it is difficult to confirm these settings scientifically and etc, I do not understand why there is no information about lack of scientific proofs. I am a reader of EnWiki, and, to tell you the exact truth, I think it to be very important to describe all points of views on that. You having edited the article on that, I do not understand why you have not added this point. I believe you to think this conception to be doubtful, therefore there is a controversy. That's why it is evident that the afore-said article is not completely correct. The article being incomplete, I cannot transcribe it.
In a word, I pray you to lay down the conventional point of view in the following article. The phrase Non-native speakers typically find the basis of articulation one of the greatest challenges in acquiring a foreign language's pronunciation. Speaking with the basis of articulation of their own native language results in a foreign accent, even if the individual sounds of the target language are produced correctly. seems not to be conventional.Роман Сидоров (г. Смоленск) (talk) 08:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Роман Сидоров (г. Смоленск) I'm afraid I don't understand much of what you have written here. It might help if you could provide me with a link to the relevant article, so that I might figure out the context. Alternatively you could raise your concerns at the article's talk page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- This article is incomplete.Роман Сидоров (г. Смоленск) (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Dodger67,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Jordan Bones (author)
Hi Roger,
Please would you have a look at my sandbox article on disabled author Jordan Bones before I publish it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mixedcases123/sandbox
Many thanks Mixedcases123 (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Mixedcases123 I've done a review and left some advice to improve the draft. When you've improved it please resubmit it for another review. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Hello, this is Katikov. I have resubmitted my draft on Global Chess Festival. Do you think it works now? Katikov (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Presumption of competence
Hello, Dodger67. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Presumption of competence".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Did you know nominations/Bahattin Hekimoğlu
Hi! Thank you for your comment at "Did you know nominations/Bahattin Hekimoğlu". As you know the old version of the phrase, I am sure you know the recent version also. Would you please add it? Thanks. CeeGee 06:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi again! Waiting for your reply. CeeGee 13:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- CeeGee Sorry, I do not know "the recent version" whatever that is supposed to mean. All I did was to point out a phrase written in bad English. It needs to be fixed by someone who has access to the source and can correctly translate it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Aha! you know that it is incorrect English, but you don't understand what it can mean. CeeGee 13:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- CeeGee Yes, we need to find someone who can help to fix the translation from Turkish. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
- Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
MEDMOS
Wrt this edit, can we find a compromise, and include the WP:WikiProject Disability/Style advice as a third item rather than the only one. The American Psychological Association: Style Guide: Disability guide has been linked to by MEDMOS for 14 years. IMO it is an even-handed guide for those writing medical texts, which obviously has overlap with MEDMOS scope. The National Center on Disability and Journalism: Disability Language Style Guide wasn't "cherry picked", as you put it, but carefully chosen. As "guidance for journalists as they cover people with disabilities" it has a wider, more lay, audience of writers in mind, and is therefore perhaps even more useful to someone who needs to mention something medical, in a non-medical article. In contrast, the WP:WikiProject Disability/Style advice is an advice essay written by two editors, one of whom left Wikipedia six years ago. The fact that a 180° flip in the nutshell was made by an IP nearly a year ago, and was only just reverted last night by WhatamIdoing, doesn't fill me with confidence that it is being closely watched and maintained.
I've read through the project advice, and the talk history about it on the project. I think it takes a complementary approach vs the two external guides linked. It assumes the reader is prepared to sit down for 15 minutes and read an essay and come away with some general advice. Which is great for that purpose. What it doesn't do, though, is answer questions for some busy editor who just wants to know how to refer to someone with cerebral palsy or with dwarfism or what the current thinking on deaf vs hard of hearing vs hearing impaired is. That's where the NCDJ guide is useful and kept up to date, though it no doubt has an American bias. It covers so many concerns, in an easily indexed format. While you originally hoped the project guide would mature and be adopted into MOS like MEDMOS was, I think we both know that there is zero chance of that happening.
Linking to external guides has the advantage of covering issues where it simply isn't worth our energy fighting over. MEDMOS, for example, refers to the International nonproprietary name as an authority on drug names. Let other, hopefully wise and well informed, people come to a consensus. Of course these external guides don't have authority but then even a MOS guideline is just a guide, not a rule.
Reading through the origin of the project guide, I noted you wrote in 2014 "Speaking for myself, I would very strongly reject any suggestion that my use of a wheelchair is part of who I am". Yet this morning you write of a shift in personal thinking and "The fact that I'm a wheelchair user is part of my identity". That's interesting and confirms that the language we use does affect how we think of ourselves and others, and vice versa. I note that the APA guide expresses no preference between "wheelchair user, person in a wheelchair", and both guides advise avoiding “confined to a wheelchair” or “wheelchair-bound”. Of course, not everyone who uses a wheelchair does to the same degree, so I guess that will also influence how much someone identifies with it.
Anyway, what do you think. Can we compromise on this? -- Colin°Talk 10:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Colin, OK, but let's try to include at least one more external style guide that is not American and one published by a major disability organization. That would give us a broader variety of viewpoints than just the academic/medical POV of APA and the journalistic approach of NCDJ.
- On a more personal note: An easy way to alienate socially/politically aware disabled people is the white-coat authoritarian "dr knows best" tone of the medical model of disability aka "so-called experts telling us how to live our lives". So I hope you'll understand how having MEDMOS discuss disability outside of a strictly medical context is a bit "itchy" in itself. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- In your project discussion that started the guide, you linked to Talking about Disability –A Style Guide (by Buckinghamshire Disability Service in the UK). That very much takes a social model approach, though it isn't exactly a "major disability organisation". Any other suggestion? Perhaps you have a view that MEDMOS is written by "doctors who know best"? I have no greater medical qualification than a Scouts First Aid Badge, and know several other similarly unqualified editors have been active at WP:MED for years. -- Colin°Talk 14:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I've added the guides back. @EEng: who tweaked the formatting a bit, and who liked the NCDJ guide. These guides offer far more than just different views on the whole "people-first" debate. There's an awful lot more to writing about disability and medical conditions than that. And they cover more examples than MEDMOS could reasonably include. I think the three external guides that are linked take three different approaches (medical professional, journalism, social model). For example, the NCDJ guide says "people with disabilities" whereas the BUDS guide says "disabled people", and I've reflected that in how the guides are mentioned. I've also mentioned and linked to the medical/social model of disability articles. -- Colin°Talk 09:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Colin Great! I think it's good now. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your help desk question
Did you ever find an answer to this question which I just now saw? I have no idea how to answer.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Vchimpanzee, no I didn't find a satisfactory solution. I created and then manually populated the category by looking at about 100 likely articles and tagging the ones that matched. We really need better tools for managing categories, but I'm not a coder by any stretch of the imagination. Thanks for resurrecting the topic. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Disability
I think that the disability flag should be present in other disability-related articles. English wikipedia is not just for English speaking countries. English Wikipedia is used universally. And if you read the article about the flag, that flag was not only approved by the Latin American countries, but also approved at the UN headquarters in Europe! Eliminating the flag solely on the grounds that it is little known is a totally invalid argument since the vast majority of Wikipedia is unaware of many things. wikipedia not only serves to collect information but for people to discover new and interesting concepts that have been recognized internationally. It is not a promotion because it is not my own creation or that of someone close to me. all the places I put it was in places related to the flag. nothing more. To put the flag of the rights of people with disabilities in the article of the movement of the rights of the disability is not correct? it does not make any sense, please stop sabotaging and allow to place it somewhere related to the flag if it were the case ... the creation of the article was applauded in the official wikipedia group on telegram. you cannot make this decision individually with a simple four sentence text. at least it must be present in the article of the movement of the rights of persons with disabilities and the international day of persons with disabilities because it is closely related to the flag. If you do not want it to be present in the main article on disability among other articles, I can respect it and I will accept it because I think you are right, but I think it is recommended that there be a middle ground and not individually decide to delete EVERYTHING. And as you have already seen, I am not the only one who thinks so, there are people who have also tried to reverse their deletions. I think this is a fair deal, it is not good that we continue with this absurd war. I will place the flag in the places where I have told you to fulfill the deal. I suppose that if you delete it again (something that I advise against without prior notice and with solid arguments in the debate of the article), it will mean that you do not agree with the treatment that I have suggested to avoid further conflicts. keep in mind that there are people who think it is a good idea to implement it. let's be fair NaviNews (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Robert Perske
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Perske, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
about Disability in Spain.
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Direction Finding by Amplitude Comparison
Hello, Dodger67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Direction Finding by Amplitude Comparison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- It's not my draft, the actual author is D1ofBerks. BTW I disagree with the rejection by the last reviewer, there's no way the draft is "contrary to the purpose of WP". Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Dodger67 You name was flagged up on my Talk Page , such are the ways of Wikipedia. Thank you for your positive comment regarding my article. However, in order to make some progress, I gave up on the original article and added a simplified version to the existing article Direction finding. Thank you once again. D1ofBerks (talk) 16:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- D1ofBerks, ok so deletion can go ahead. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
- Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
|
Happy First Edit Day, Dodger67, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 20:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC) |
Get well soon!
I saw this edit - wishing you a speedy recovery! Greenman (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Mahmut Bozteke
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mahmut Bozteke has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thanks, it looks good. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Dodger67:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
"Spelling and capitalization of racial and ethnic terms Racial and ethnic groups are designated by proper nouns and are capitalized. Therefore, use “Black” and “White” instead of “black” and “white” (do not use colors to refer to other human groups; doing so is considered pejorative). Likewise, capitalize terms such as “Native American,” “Hispanic,” and so on. Capitalize “Indigenous” and “Aboriginal” whenever they are used. Capitalize “Indigenous People” or “Aboriginal People” when referring to a specific group (e.g., the Indigenous Peoples of Canada), but use lowercase for “people” when describing persons who are Indigenous or Aboriginal (e.g., “the authors were all Indigenous people but belonged to different nations”)."
I have undone your revisions.
Draft: Servants of Christ the King
To Dodger67, thank you very much for looking at this and also for consulting further. I hope the fact that Canterbury Cathedral have acknowledged the movement by commissioning a permanent memorial might count in the balance - those involved in the commissioning were not directly part of SCK I believe (though there were historical links); if that helps. Many thanks for your considerationJacantha (talk) 08:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Jacantha, let's wait a bit to see if anyone at WikiProject Anglicanism might come up with something useful. The subject is actually way outside of my comfort zone, so I'm not able to add any significant content. However, I did find this:
- Parker, Olive (October 1967). "The Servants of Christ the King". Contact. 21 (1): 13–17. doi:10.1080/13520806.1967.11759127.
- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Really appreciate this link ! thank you Dodger67 and again, your taking it up ..of course, wait for any developments Jacantha (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Robits
Is it possible that you can either it Franco tradisionele disse (talk) 16:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Franco tradisionele disse, jammer ek verstaan nie wat jy hier bedoel nie. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Kan jy dit redigeer Franco tradisionele disse (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Franco tradisionele disse, (Back to English for the TPSs benefit). What you could do is first create articles about the dishes you're interested in. As one of the others said, dishes mentioned on the cuisine article should really have their own articles. I'd be happy to help edit your drafts, even though it's not a topic area I'm fully comfortable with, I am quite clued up about the standards and style of Wikipedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Franco tradisionele disse (talk) 17:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)