User talk:Doc James/Archive 60

Archive 55

←

Archive 58

Archive 59

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

→

Archive 65

A request for help

Hi, James. I'm writing to you today because I don't know anyone else with the connections on wikipedia sufficient enough to help me with my question. It's regarding reference templates. See I've created two pmid templates (Template:Cite_pmid/22020178 and Template:Cite_pmid/9147128) and cited them on the Bexarotene page and while I've personally edited these two templates I can't see those edits on the Bexarotene page. I've done this before and the change was seen immediately by myself so I'm wondering if there's some new rule on Wiki regarding templates or whether I've missed something or made some mistake when filling out the template. Thanks for your time and help, Fuse809. Fuse809 (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I hate cite pmid templates. Much prefer cite journal templates (such as the one produced by the WP:RefToolbar. It sometimes takes template time to refresh. You might need to clear you cash. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

The reason I do them is to save time. If it's saved in wikipedia's memory then I don't have to keep filling 'em out all the time. I only ever do them for general journal articles. Journal articles that apply to more than one wikipedia article. Any reason why you particularly hate it? Fuse809 (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

There is an autofill button within the "ref toolbar" that fills in all the details when given the PMID/DOI/ISBN

Am working on translating a lot of content into a lot of languages in collaboration with Translators Without Borders. Other languages often do not support cite PMID and cite DOI. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, thanks for that I didn't know but I tested it out with one of those journal articles I made that template on and it didn't get it 100% right. It missed that the article had a doi. Hence it is still a little limited, so there's still a rationale for using templates. Fuse809 (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

One can add those details to the cite journal template fairly easily. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Testosterone article--Adverse effects section, footnotes 98, 99

Hi, i'm rather concerned that footnotes 98 and 99 are being misused. Both are studies on adult males, and 99 is on males with deficiency, which could be quite different than the situation for recreational use, which is located directly above adverse effects section(giving impression studies apply to recreational users.)Thanks, Rich Peterson 76.218.104.210 (talk) 02:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

p.s: Looking around the web just now, i've decided the adverse effects section is outrageously bad. I haven't read the entire article so maybe it mentions somewhere be careful when pregnant, but that warning should be in adverse effects section as well. drugs.com says

"Pregnancy Warnings
Testosterone Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Warnings

Testosterone is also known as: Andro LA 200, AndroGel, Androderm, Axiron, Bio-T-Gel, Delatest, Delatestryl, Depandro 100, Depo-Testosterone, Depotest, Duratest, Everone, FIRST-Testosterone MC, Fortesta, Histerone, Meditest, Striant, Testamone-100, Testim, Testoderm, Testolin, Testopel, Testopel Pellets, Testro AQ, Virilon IM

  Testosterone Pregnancy Warnings

If reversible oligospermia occurs, the androgen can be discontinued and if restarted, a lower dosage should be utilized. Testosterone has been assigned to pregnancy category X by the FDA. Androgen use, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, causes virilization of the external genitalia of the female fetus. Reversible oligospermia may occur after prolonged androgen administration or excessive dosage. There are no controlled data in human pregnancy. Testosterone use is considered contraindicated during pregnancy.

 Testosterone Breastfeeding Warnings

There are no data on the excretion of testosterone into human milk. Because many drugs are excreted into human milk and because of the potential for adverse effects on the nursing infant, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or discontinue the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother. Androderm is contraindicated in nursing women, and Depo-Testosterone is not recommended for use in nursing mothers." -RichardPeterson76.218.104.210 (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Do not get what the issue is. Both are review articles. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

What? I don't understand the point of your reply. I never said I had a problem with the quality of the articles, I couldn't assess that and didnt even know they were review articles. I did say or at least meant to say, either/and here or in the edits, the cited articles were being misused in the sentences they were used in, partly because the sentences didn't say they were about males, pArtly because the sentences didn't say the articles were about THERAPY, and partly because of the sentences were closely placed next to recreational use section. But I am glad that you have since then inserted a sentence stating that testosterone is contraindicated in pregnancy. A citation for that should be provided. 76.218.104.210 (talk) 06:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

There is a cit support that it is contraindicated in preg? We know state that the concerns are just in males. Will add the bit about therapeutic use. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Appears you already fixed that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

nope, i think i just didn't notice it was already there.76.218.104.210 (talk) 07:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Let me know if you want anything else adjusted. Else please create an account and than you to after a bit can edit the page in question :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:32, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Changes to scabies page

Hi there,

Thanks for your brief but useful feedback on the section I added to the scabies page. I am new to this and trying to get the hang of making contributions to wikipedia pages. I have gone through the pages you referenced to in your comment, and now understand the article structure we need to try to stick to in these kinds of articles. I was hoping you could clarify one other thing though: I noticed you removed three references (journal articles that support the statement that some disease control strategies have reduced the prevalence of scabies in certain areas). I'm sure there is a good reason to have removed them, so my intent isn't to argue their removal, just hoped you could clarify the why so I don't make a similar mistake in the future. I'm going through a bit of a learning curve here :)

Thanks again!

Dhendrickx (talk) 09:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure per WP:MEDRS we typically use secondary sources rather than primary sources. The three studies I removed were primary sources. We explain why this is our policy on that page. BestDoc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Got it! Thanks! Dhendrickx (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Sertraline

Is there a reason why sertraline has no adverse effect section or should I feel free to create one? Fuse809 (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Broken code. Fixed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

• Traffic report: Six strikes out

• WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests

• News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions

• Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion

• Recent research: Translation assignments, weasel words, and Wikipedia's content in its later years

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Vandalization warning

Hi Jmh,

I received this vandalization warning even though I don't have a Wikipedia account when I typed in military bases in the search bar I have not vandalized any Wikipedia articles which I don't think is possible without an account any help would be appreciated here is the message and the link included here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.142.50.80&redirect=no

User talk:71.142.50.80 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search February 2010[edit] Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Physical trauma, you will be blocked from editing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. 71.142.50.80 (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Caleb Bigelow

It was likely whoever was using this IP last. The warning if from 2010. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

SSRIs

I just took a meat axe to the Mechanism of Action section of the SSRI article, which dedicated 4x as much text to individual editors' favorite non-mainstream hypotheses as to the typical explanation found in pharmacology textbooks.

I also added a little mainstream material from Goodman and Gilman's Pharmacology of Therapeutics for this. If you can suggest other sources (preferably available for free on the web!) I'm all ears. Also, if you feel I inadvertently made things worse, feel free to revert or otherwise modify.

Thanks Formerly 98 (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

If you are chopping primary sources and replacing them with secondary ones you have my support :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

abortion RFC

Pardon me, but you're the only user thus far that has given a rationale for opposing the suggestion for the removal of information pertaining to spontaneous abortion. While I honestly appreciate a counter argument based on sound reasoning, I was wondering if you could expand the rationale for me. I just don't understand how the little tid bits of information on spontaneous abortion is related to the article as a whole (the only non descript section that deals with spontaneous abortion is not even related to humans).The change I proposed wouldn't change much about the article (a search for spontaneous abortion already takes you to the miscarriage page) but I believe it help would give license to focus on the topic at hand... the information provided on spontaneous abortion is so small it just seems out of place and to expand on that information would tend to make the article bloated.. So I am earnestly curious on what value this relatively small amount of information has to the article as a whole? I'm relatively new to wikipedia and (judging by your user page) you seem to be pretty experienced here, so any insight you could provide would be helpful.Nickmxp (talk) 03:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

We follow the best available literature. Abortion refers to both both spontaneous and induced. It is like the article on obesity. Obesity refers to both adults and children. Yes we just have a small section on children that than links out to a whole article. We are neither changing the name of the obesity article to "obesity in adults" nor are we removing the section on "childhood obesity". Same here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I think the obesity page is a good illustration of my point...The article speaks of obesity in general... now if that article had ten sections about childhood obesity and a section in a half on obesity in adults, I would say you had an article about childhood obesity on your hands and give the same recomendations I posted for the Abortion page... Unlike the obesity page the abortion page isn't about abortion in general. It is about induced abortions, I don't think anyone would disagree with that assessment. Your statement that abortion refers to both spontaneous and induced is medically accurate but that accuracy is not reflected in the article, the word abortion is generally used in this article already to mean induced abortions. If this was a page about abortion in a general sense to keep iin the same style of the Obesity page shouldn't it also link out to a page on Induced Abortions as it already does to miscarriages?Nickmxp (talk) 12:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

These sorts of issues are judgement calls. They are based on majority consensus. Consensus is to keep it the way it is. Should we have more information on "spontaneous abortion" within the article? Yes probably. This is on my list of articles to improve, I just have not got there yet. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

another thing to think about and I'll leave ya alone.. The term abortion in a general sense isn't always a medical condition, it is also a medical procedure... two different topics worthy of two seperate articles...Nickmxp (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Often it is spontaneous and not a procedure at all. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Down syndrome

"In this case, the long arm of chromosome 21 is attached to another chromosome, often chromosome 14 known as 46XY,t(14q21q) in males.[49][45]" Did you add this material, or have access to these sources? A translocation karyotype would be 45XY + the details about the specific translocation. Just wondering if your sources say something different. Canada Hky (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

This ref says 46 [1] but yes could be wrong. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll find a better source. Chromosomes for a karyotype are counted based on the number of centromeres, a derivative chromosome only has one discernible centromere. Canada Hky (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay, yes source was wrong. Corrected with better source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wait, I may be talking about something different (although there is still a problem). The parent who carries the translocation would be 45, the affected child would be 46, but by convention trisomy 21 karyotypes always say +21 at the end, just to make things clear. I'll get this straightened out once I find my text. Canada Hky (talk) 17:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

It's the weekend and my textbooks are at the office. A person carrying the translocation will be 45, an affected person with translocation trisomy would be 46 with a +21 notation, but I don't have a reference available right now. If you can track down a copy of Thompson and Thompson, they would probably have the appropriate cite. Canada Hky (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your revert

[2] Hi Jmh649! Why souldn't "general audience" learn the psychiatric terms of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia? I mean, I didn't remove the English description... Now, after removing the links to anhedonia and asociality, "general audience" doesn't even have the chance to learn the terms... SelfishSeahorse (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

PS: The article does include many other Greek/Latin terms. Why not removing them all? SelfishSeahorse (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

We should write in simple language as much as possible. This is not the place to teach psychiatric terminology. We do have a Category:Psychiatric terminology though. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I just reinserted the links to anhedonia and asociality for reasons of consistency (because alogia and blunted affect are also linked). I hope you don't mind. Otherwise, feel free to revert again... :-) Cheers. --SelfishSeahorse (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

That is good thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Appreciation for your thanking me on Pneumonia edits

I appreciate your having taken time to send a thank-you, Doc James. EtymAesthete (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

My grammar is not the best :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Cannabis

What would be best for our readers is what I am bringup at an informal Wiki-meet-up this coming weekend (about 10 of us Ottawa University)..The questions I will be asking the group about Cannabis are.... Should we just have the article at "Marijuana" as its clear the average person uneducated with the topic thinks this is correct? Or should we have it at the correct name to educate people off the bat? What is best to educate more....what would the average person search for....what would be the most direct way to the article? Do people skip over our article at Wikipedia called "Cannabis (drug)" in favour of the next article they see called "marijuana". Does the redirect of marijuana appear in the top 10 of search engines. Do we need to expand more on the terms because peoples understanding of why there is a difference between the terms is relevant (as in we have distinctions for stats, labs, researcher etc...) How can this be worded so that a grade 5 student would understand? Would love any feedback you can give so I can bring it to the group anonymously. -- Moxy (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

I think one key is that we want the whole topic area similarly named or it will result in confusion. Cannabis binds to the cannabis receptor etc. If you do a google search for marijuana Wikipedia's article on cannabis comes up first and we are in googles box to the right. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

• Traffic report: Six strikes out

• WikiProject report: Special report: Contesting contests

• News and notes: Wiki-PR defends itself, condemns Wikipedia's actions

• Arbitration report: Kafziel case closed; Kww admonished by motion

• Recent research: Translation assignments, weasel words, and Wikipedia's content in its later years

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: Translations

I'm sorry for the delay in my response; I have been very busy planning for a big move. I will take a look at integrating the new texts in about a week when I get back from vacation. Also, feel free to leave messages for me on the English Wikipedia, it is my primary Wikipedia.--Danaman5 (talk) 07:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Undo move

I moved the page Annulus of Zinn to Arterial circle of Zinn–Haller as it seemed to be a better term. But soon I learnt that arterial circle of Zinn–Haller is a separate entity lying in relation to Annulus of Zinn which is a fibrous extension of extraocular muscles. The move needs to be undone. Can you help. Diptanshu^Talk 16:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Done Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Extra spaces and Chinese formatting issues

I hope you can fix that issues before adding, but I am testing AWB for fixing in case. 乌拉跨氪 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will speak with the translators and see what we can do. This user [3] has offered to help. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Should I know which User will be used for adding? So I can keep on it.乌拉跨氪 (talk) 05:44, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Certainly. Progress can be followed here [4] and this is the most recent addition here [5] by User:Yexiaoxing Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I have checked the most recently added one (zh:灼伤), and I am still checking for any issue that might exist. --Xiaoxing Ye Talk to me in zhwiki 17:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Smallbones/Questions on FTC rules

Thanks for the help, sorry if I'm sometimes stubborn. Any additional help appreciated. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

NDSS

You're right! Thank you for the correction. National Down Syndrome Society 17:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssjs2010 (talk • contribs)

You wouldn't happen to know what percentage of people with DS graduate from high school? I could find no data. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry - I wasn't trying to ignore your comments. Would you mind giving a look to the reference that I just added? It addresses how the idea that people with Down syndrome are always/usually happy doesn't reflect actual evidence, and can be very damaging. Please let me know what you think!National Down Syndrome Society 17:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssjs2010 (talk • contribs)

Let move to the talk page of the article in question. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

high school graduation rates

I will look into the stats on high school graduation and Down syndrome and get back to you.National Down Syndrome Society 17:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssjs2010 (talk • contribs)

Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Aciclovir

Hi, I've been editing the aciclovir page in my sandbox and I'd like to check whether or not the section on pregnancy is OK. See I made references to the equivalent doses (without actually giving exact dosages just giving reference to equivalents to standard human doses) in humans and they may be bordering on dosing references so I'm just checking whether it's OK. Fuse809 (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Simplified text. What do you think? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

It's OK. Just one little thing, the 11x exposure was only in rats, not in the other animals. Fuse809 (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure feel free to adjust more Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey, one other thing. Is there any need for images of tablets or the powdered form of drugs in articles? There's two such images in the aciclovir article and I don't really see what it adds to the article. I noticed that WP:PHARMMOS and WP:MEDMOS make no reference to such images. Fuse809 (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't think you saw this as you've replied to things since then but not this so I'm leaving this message to get you to see it. Fuse809 (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Yah would say the image of powder is not needed. Happy with the image of the tablets. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Refs: reply

Please see reply to your comment here: Refs. (Nimptsch3 (talk))

Please see another reply. Thanks! Nimptsch3 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Одговор

If you want some other names create a redirect, merge pages can only administrators. --Mstudiodf (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Just wanting to add the content of both together. A none admin should be able to do that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

High School

The statistics for high school graduation rates simply don't exist. Therefore, it seems like it would make sense to alter the sentence in prognosis that reads "Some with Down syndrome graduate from high school; however, most do not." True, the sentence is citing a source, but the source itself is drawing on any hard data. Thoughts? National Down Syndrome Society 21:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)--National Down Syndrome Society 21:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssjs2010 (talk • contribs)

Yes I could not find any data either. It is amazing that their is not any. You think it would be relatively easy to figure out. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 21:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Ah found some data. Appears to be around 8.5% graduate from highschool.[6] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 21:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Mechlorethamine

Hi, I'm sending this message to you to ask you whether I should move the mechlorethamine page to chlormethine as this is its INN and BAN? Mechlorethamine isn't even the USAN, but it seems in common use in the US. Fuse809 (talk) 03:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: Medical translations @ Macedonian Wikipedia

Hi, Doc James. I'm willing to help with the integration of the translated articles in Macedonian. --Brainmachine (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you and wonderful to hear. We have all the articles that have been translated added. They probably need a little bit of fixing up and integration with the pre existing text if any. We would also love advice on if there are any articles that we should not translate. They key page for the project is this one. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force/RTT Let me know if you have any questions about it. I can also connect you with the translators if you are finding concerns / changes you wish made. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

• Update: For Macedonian, the articles:
  • Schizophrenia (=mk:Шизофренија),
  • HIV/AIDS (=mk:Синдром на стекнат имунолошки дефицит), and
  • Lung cancer (=mk:Рак на бели дробови)

should be set to "Do not translate". I wasn't sure if I should change their status myself in the table, so I'm informing you (I hope this is okay). I'll keep you updated on further changes. --Brainmachine (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Suicide / Суицид или самоубиство

Your article is deleted because there is already article Самоубиство with the same content. If you need space to experiment, you may want to do that in your user space, eg. sr:Корисник:Jmh649/Суицид или самоубиство. As far as translation of this particular word goes, please use самоубиство (суицид is not Serbian word). --Dcirovic (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks. What about integrating the two? Do you know anyone who would be interested in helping with this project in Serbian? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Merge is an option, providing that the machine translation is of sufficient quality. The amount of work that is necessary for the merge of articles that are already large, could be quite substantial. I could try to help. You may want to place a summary of what you are trying to accomplish here, and invite others to participate too. -- Dcirovic (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

These are not machine translations, they are human translations. Will add something. There is some broken markup as some of the translators translated too much. We are working on addressing that.

Wondering for the remaining articles on this list Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Translation_task_force/RTT if you could add if they should or should not be translated such as you see for Swedish. We do not want the translators who are volunteering there time to we wasting it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll have a look within next 24h.--Dcirovic (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Appreciate it. We can help clean up the markup issues. Most can be fixed using WikEd and find and replace. An overview on adding articles is here [7] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

I have marked the remaining entries, as to whether translation is needed or not. Over the next few weeks, I will attempt to incorporate some of the translated manuscripts into the corresponding Wikipedia pages. The progress status will be kept on the above RTT list.--Dcirovic (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

I forgot

I went to revert myself and saw that you beat me to it. I temporarily forgot I'm still on voluntary 7-day away from Vitamin D editing. My apologies. Dicklyon (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Ah no worries. Thought as much. And please use simple language. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm not so keen on the over-simplified language, obviously. The point comes through more strongly when it says what it means. The source doesn't really support the over-simplification to what is in reality a statistical inference. Dicklyon (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Which is why we need talk page discussion. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Serbian

I'm sorry but I cant help you, because I'm not very familiar with medicine, and medical terms.--Марко Станојевић (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

The main thing we need help with is adding the articles and fixing any formatting that broke during translation. It is not that hard. No understanding of medical terminology is really needed :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 20:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Can I be of some help? Being Slovenian, i.e. one-time (and still) a neighbour, I could be useful - "for the old time sake":) Drop me a note at SmozBleda (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

thanks for the feedback

Hi, So if I find a secondary source and I am not sure about it, I can ask you? On the secondary sources comment you left me, were you referring to a particular reference I had made or was that just a general comment? Anyway thanks for the help! Oh, and when i am answering a post you made on my talk page, do I need to copy it over here so you know what I am talking about? Reefswaggie (talk) 02:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Was referring to this [8]. Sure you can ask me. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

cs iw: Local integrator

Hi, thank you for information on my Talk. I dare not guarantee project now due to lack of time. But of course I'm prepare to work continuosly in reveiwing process of translated articles from WP Medicine Translation Task Force (very good idea). So I will check the articles step by step that have been added; e.g. in "schizophrenia translation" you can paste translated text on my sandbox, I will try to merge actual version with a new text and than you/or author can the new content paste from sandbox into the Czech article.--Misbeliever (talk) 10:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC) (on Czech: Kacir)

Done Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

OK, I will inform you.--Misbeliever (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Translations

Before anyone starts a translation in ... for example ... Greek, you should also provide what is already written in el wikipedia. It makes no sense for us to delete everything already written (good or bad) and replace it with a translation from en-wikiedia. --FocalPoint (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes. Would you be able to mark which ones we should and should not translated? Have emailed about the epilepsy article and stopped translating. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

El-wikipedia is likely to have articles on most main subjects. The point is not to stop translating, but to merge the existing text from the article in greek with translated text from en-wikipedia. --FocalPoint (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes agree. If there is a featured article in Greek translation is probably not needed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

PDE3

Hi, I've noticed that the phosphodiesterase 3 page goes by the name "PDE3" and I think the full name of the drug would be more appropriate for the title of this article and hence I'm here to ask whether you'd think it'd be a prudent move of mine to move the page to "phosphodiesterase 3". Fuse809 (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes sounds reasonable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Oral rehydration therapy

Hi Doc James,

Thanks for helping with Oral rehydration therapy. If you have a chance, there's an issue with some publications recommending 1 teaspoon salt per liter and others, including other WHO sources, recommending only 1/2 teaspoon. It reallly is kind of remarkable. In addition, there's been a question of how much emphasis to give to the adjuncts such as zinc supplements, teaching family members warning signs of moderate and severe dehydration, and encouraging the patient with diarrhea to continue to eat if some appetite is present. Any help you can provide would be most appreciated. Cool Nerd (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

We discuss this in detail at gastroenteritis. Will look further tonight. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Toothache

You may want to look at toothache as a potential for translation. It's been clean up nicely and has a broad overview of a general topic. Ian Furst (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 02:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Chikungunya, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:Sunray (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Circumcision

I actually don't care if my edit goes in or not, I was trying to help. I have had Penis cancer and thought that the article should have the best information available.

The two primary sources I used followed the guidelines very closely for MedRS, in that I drew exactly the conclusion in the study, confirmed that the studies were large and credible, and that the data was consistent with other sources, and linked to other pages this filled in the details.

It is hard to do legitimate work in Wikipedia, and I am trying not to give up. I had been having discussions on the talk page, but it seems too common that Wikilawyering has primacy over good intent. I know this page is a battleground, so I know you have good intent, and I had run some of this by Zad before, and assumed that he would work with me. There is plenty of reason to believe the numbers I put up were very reasonable and almost certainly too low. I have zero agenda, except to get accurate information that is consistent with Wikipedia policies. And also to learn to coexist on Wikipedia. Bob the goodwin (talk) 04:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey Bob. Use high quality recent review articles and all will be well. Consensus is that for controversial medical content secondary sources are required. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll drop Bob a more detailed note about the sources on his User Talk. Zad68 05:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Tegafur-uracil

Hi, from what I gathered from reading the WP:PHARMMOS article that the slash operator is meant to separate the names of combination products but for some reason the tegafur-uracil article violates this rule and I'm wondering why and whether I should move the page to tegafur/uracil. Fuse809 (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to move. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)