User talk:DocFreeman24/Archives/2021/July
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New page reviewer granted
Hi DocFreeman24. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
That would appear to be the Brescia LTA - see: User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Video game case law Good Articles
Hello. I have been editing several articles about video game case law and I am coming off the high of improving Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc. to a good article. I was wondering if you thought any of the other articles I was working on had any potential to be a good article too. Or if you know any other gaps in our coverage so I could try a new article. Here are a few I've seen:
- Spry Fox, LLC v. Lolapps, Inc. (I did most of this and I think it's pretty good)
- Stardock Systems, Inc. v. Reiche (This one too and there's actually too many sources here)
- Capcom U.S.A. Inc. v. Data East Corp. (This too)
- Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. (This is older and accurate sources are harder)
- Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman (I haven't touched this one but it looks good so far)
- Data East USA, Inc. v. Epyx, Inc. (I haven't touched this one either and it's more messy)
Also, do you know what is good form if I improve an article after someone has really done most of the hard work? Should I contact them somehow? Any feedback is helpful. Jorahm (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for not responding sooner, I saw this message and then it slipped out of my mind! I'll take a look at these but thanks for doing all this work to improve these articles! That's really cool of you!
- As to your question, I don't think there's anything you need to do/say if you improve an article that someone else created/worked on. Are you talking about submitting an article for Good Article status or something else? DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Question about new article review
DocFreeman24, thank you for swiftly reviewing and moving to article space the most recent page about a scientific subject I created. I have another article that is very brief, only two paragraphs long or so, and recently published it, but it moved straight to space with no pending submission box or deadline for review; can you take a quick look at it please? --> Ramon Rivas - Thanks again! Multi7001 (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)