DoNotTakeTheBait
Welcome! edit
Hello, DoNotTakeTheBait, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of youngest birth mothers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of youngest birth mothers was changed by DoNotTakeTheBait (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95665 on 2015-07-26T02:47:36+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:47, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is clearly a false positive of a WP:PROD for a WP:BLP. I will revert your edit unless it is made by a non-bot. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of youngest birth mothers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. If you feel the article should be deleted, you can open discussion, but do not blank the article while discussion is ongoing. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- You're template-warning me for putting on a PROD tag that you disagreed with? What is wrong with you? DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 02:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. I'm warning you for blanking an article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:BLP. Quit being dishonest and quit harassing me. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- How does BLP apply to somebody born in 1825? —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- They do for the recently born. That's exactly what I stated in the PROD. But just FYI, I am not reverting the PROD. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- There is identifiable information of non-notable cases of raped girls on that list. However, my issue on my talk page is your abuse of the warning tag. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I think C. Fred's issue with you is your apparent abuse of the delete key. Which do you think is the greater offense? And by the way, did you choose your username anticipating this conflict? Just curious... General Ization Talk 03:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- I blanked an article per PROD BLP as is required, and I stand by my rationale even though I did not revert PROD removal. I think you're baiting me, yes, but I wasn't anticipating someone deliberately doing so, no. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I think C. Fred's issue with you is your apparent abuse of the delete key. Which do you think is the greater offense? And by the way, did you choose your username anticipating this conflict? Just curious... General Ization Talk 03:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- There is identifiable information of non-notable cases of raped girls on that list. However, my issue on my talk page is your abuse of the warning tag. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- They do for the recently born. That's exactly what I stated in the PROD. But just FYI, I am not reverting the PROD. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- How does BLP apply to somebody born in 1825? —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:BLP. Quit being dishonest and quit harassing me. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. I'm warning you for blanking an article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
BLP is the greatest offense at Wikipedia. But I accept C. Fred's initial edit that it is not clearly a BLP issue, and pursuant to PROD BLP revert policy, I won't revert since it's an older article. That doesn't make it any less of a BLP issue in :re living non-notable rape victims. DoNotTakeTheBait (talk) 03:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Blocked edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.