Dmcdysan

Multiple cites to the same source

When you use a source more than once in an article, but use different pages, you can append the "rp" template after the reference to indicate different pages. For example, Constant314 (talk) 03:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I am relatively new to Wikipedia. I see that the rp template is helpful to make the text more concise when referencing page (ranges). I have often cited the same source, but different equations and/or sections, usually not just page number (ranges). Do you know of another template that could do this to yield a result similar to the rp Template instead of stating the other details (e.g., section, equation number) in-line? My comment was that I believe adding this detail to the citation template as you did would increase the number of citations in the References list. OK for a single citation, but not as concise for multiple sections/equations/etc from the same citation. Dmcdysan (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

I looked at rp template in more detail and it appears that "In-source-location" field can do this. Dmcdysan (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Test of Pin Section and Automatic Archive ClueBot III

Help:Archiving_a_talk_page

Template:Pin section

Help:Archiving a talk page

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

Your edit to Younger Dryas impact hypothesis has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

@Diannaa I see that my post is crossed out on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis so I cannot directly respond to " it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. " It appears the issue is that I quoted several sentences and should have rewritten it using my own words. I understand and will not do this again. Thank you. Dmcdysan (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)