User talk:Deepfriedokra/Archive 8

(Redirected from User talk:Dlohcierekim/Archive 8)
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Setanta747 in topic Chronology vs Timeline

Contacting me edit

If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to use This Talk Page.

Archives edit

Archive 1 March 3, 2006 - May 4, 2006

Archive 2 May 5, 2006 - May 25, 2006

Archive 3 May 26, 2006 - August3, 2006

Archive 4 August 5, 2006 - August 25, 2006

Archive 5 August 25, 2006 - September 27, 2006

Archive 6 October 3 2006 - Oct 29 2006

Archive 7 October 30, 2006 - November 29, 2006

Archive 8 November 29, 2006 - July 7, 2007

The Messages (Please add new messages at the bottom of the page. edit

Pine View School edit

Dlohcierekim, while reverting vandalism on Pine View School, you marked it for cleanup. I was just curious as to whether you had any suggestions for how it might be cleaned up. Thanks! --Starwiz 23:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, since I think the tag is ugly, I'm going to get rid of it. If anything comes to you, let me know! --Starwiz 00:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

  Thanks for your support at my RfA, which was successful. I've got a lot to learn and any advice is welcome as I learn to use the new tools. I appreciated your question, as I would have liked to address it originally but didn't want to be too long-winded! Thanks again, and forgive my use of this dorky message box :) -- Renesis (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply  

RfA for DaveyDweeb edit

On your support for DaveyDweeb, I noticed you didn't sign it. Hope you don't mind, but I did it for you. :) Bubba hotep 15:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thank you for voting on my administrator tryout.--Rat235478683--

Thank you! edit

Thanks!Sorry did i do something wrong? Medgirl2008 14:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Medgirl2008Reply

Not that I noticed. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14
49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


RfA: Khukri edit

Just a quick note to say thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It became clear very quickly that my editing background was going to detrimental to my nomination. Having seen other recent RfA's fail once one or two admins opposed and others just piled on the vote, I decided it would save the ignominy if I withdrew my nomination. I don't intend to change the work I do as it's what I enjoy, so it'll be unlikely I'll apply again. Anyway thanks again for taking the time to review my nomination and giving your support. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 11:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

marios edit

ok sorry about that mate. will post on uncyclopdeia. this is my first time so Im a bit new with editing and tags etc —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Volcomicity (talkcontribs) 07:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Cool. I've been to Unencyclopedia, and I'm sure they will appreciate it there. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 07:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Travis insco edit

I think it would be safe to remove the "hangon" tag you added, he hasn't made any attempt to rectify Nashville Monkey 08:35, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Creator removed the bloody speedy tag at least once. I figured I'd help him out. He may not be too happy with us right now. Someone blocked his user ID because it was . . . not a good choice. I'm content to leave the hangon tag in case there is some sort of notability derived from the bands the subject works with. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 08:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Works for me :-P Nashville Monkey 08:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
That didn't take long... Nashville Monkey 11:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Extra RFA questions edit

Hi. Thank you for asking the additional questions on my RFA. Just a note to let you know that I have now answered yours and those added by other users. Thank you for taking such an interest in my nomination. Wikiwoohoo 15:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for your support with my RfA. My nomination succeeded. I appreciate your support. I've seen your name go by the Recent Changes list many times and I wanted to also thank you for all the hard work you do. =) Thanks again! -- Gogo Dodo 23:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

George Leo Haydock edit

Hello: my picture was deleted. "Image:HaydockTitle.JPEG. Tried to find it on the "Deletion Log" for a reason, but am not sure what to enter for "Title" No matter what I enter there is no record. Can you find out the reason for deletion? It is the title page to a book that is 200 years old. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.20.116.119 (talkcontribs) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 12:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:HaydockTitle.JPEG edit

Thanks for your note.
According to the message from orphanbot, the message was uploaded without a license tag. User:Naconkantari deleted the image Nov.29 for no license tag.
I it take that this was an image you scanned of a very old book. Explain the situation to User:Naconkantari. He might undelete the image. Ask his advice has to how to proceed.


I would recommend the following. Read

Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#Fair_use. It has more copyright image tags than I can comprehend. You could try putting a {{PD-old}} tag on when you re-upload the image or if it is undeleted. In the description part and the discussion page put all the information you have about the image, ie ""scanned by me from a very old book. Only image available to illustrate the subject."" That sort of thing. As much detail as you have.

Another possibility is {{HistoricPhoto}}, with the same description info. It is not a photo, but the historic necessity part is the same. It would be a fairuse tag, and we don't like fairuse. We much prefer public domain. If the book is very old, it is probably in the public domain. Hope that helps. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skodoway (talkcontribs) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

link help edit

hi i want to add a link to another article (Brainwashed) but there are many entries under 'Brainwashed' and i can't seem to find a way to select the one i want. i'm sure the info is there but i guess i'm being confused by the language used. hope you can help, thnaks danielIsaacstorm 14:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia does not appear to have an article about the album in question. Please see WP:MUSIC to see if the subject meets inclusion criteria. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Re: Blanked comment edit

I made a mistake. The comment was supoosed to be in the Spokane Cheifs' discussion, not the Seattle Thunderbirds. Hope that clears things up. --142.165.255.180 00:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:the Thursturain Chronicles edit

User:The Thursturain Chronicles is what i have called my page, but i don't want it to say "User" so could you Help me?

My RfA edit

Hi. Thank you very much for your help, as well as for standing in my defence at certain times during my RfA. It is very much appreciated :) Wikiwoohoo 18:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Just seeking to clarify and understand. I tend to be a little too blunt sometimes. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Not a problem. Wikiwoohoo 18:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

The changing fate of GNAA article edit

I think it says a lot about how our FA standards have changed since last year. Long ago notability was determined by how many AfDs the group already underwent. And that was the opinion of Ta bu shi da yu who had contributed many FAs back then. ;-) Kimchi.sg 00:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Strange. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Korova edit

Hi,
If you want to nominate Korova (Scottish band) for deletion, be my guest. That page started off as an entry in a dab. I spun it off because that was the best way to clean up the dab, but I did not mean to claim that the band is an encyclopedic topic. --Smack (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cool. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congrats! edit

You have been named one of User:Editor37's favourite users! You rock! --Editor37 03:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

????????????????????????????? edit

dood, do u like just no everyone cuz you put somat on my talk page like 3 secs after i registered, how do you keep up wit dsi stuff? are you like on your comp 24-7??? an y do u do it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ćhokedeath (talkcontribs) 14:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Message to editor37 edit

you message editor37 but did not make a new heading and how it is hard to understand please try to not do this. Thanks for your time!! --The Dwarf_King 13:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Username edit

  • The concern about my sig is surprising; I've been asked about it only twice in all my career. My sig has always been this; changing now would mean disavowing my former edits and be perhaps more confusing. Some editors think of me by sig, some by username; changing either will puzzle somebody. If I must choose one, I would prefer the sig, which I intended as my wikipedia identity; but I have usually, and may have now, too many edits to change my username, and I do not wish to put that quite considerable burden on WP:CHU. Septentrionalis 18:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your note. I guess I'm being overly picky. That's just a pet peeve of mine. It probably should not bear on the AfD. Will strike from my comment. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
For what it's worth, my 3RR violation was accidental; I was dealing with a user who was persistently reverting to the same text, and had been blocked before. I lost count over the course of a day and did a fourth reversion in 23:45, instead of proposing an alternate text, as I had intended, or going to AN3 myself. Septentrionalis 20:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for the welcoming, will do my best around here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rick Mullins (talkcontribs) 22:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

s'right. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 22:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page needs reviewing edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joshb182 (talkcontribs) 16:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

The Thursturain Chronicles edit

The Thursturain Chronicles Thanks For your Answer...These Flipping year 8's and 7's keep on VANDAlISING my page and is getting IMMENSELY ANNOYING. Can you lock it and if can, can I still be able to edit my own page...HHHEEELLLPPP THEY ARE REALLY ANNOYING!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Thursturain Chronicles (talkcontribs) 08:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Thank you for voting edit

File:In-the-dark.jpg

Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you also for your kind note on my talk page. I anticipate that I will have another attempt at adminship in the early part of the new year. Thanks again. Wikiwoohoo 19:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Belated RfA Thanks edit

 I would like to take the time to thank you for voting in my unsuccessful RFA. I will try to run again after getting some more experience and edits under my belt, hopefully with less confrontations. Have a nice day, and I apologize for the laggy response! -- Chris is me 17:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:The Thursturain Chronicles edit

User:The Thursturain Chronicles HELP!!! They KEEP ON EDITING MY ARTICLE, i am fed up, i have better things to do, like, FINISH THE NOVEL!!! i just want the articleto be LEFT ALONE...please?

My response. Requested semi-protection. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. edit

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful. I will do my best to wield the broom wisely! | Mr. Darcy talk 20:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gladys edit

  The Original Gladys Holiday Greeting
For your hard work, insighful opinions and overall contribution to Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow, I hereby award you this Thank You, along with my sincere hope that you have a wonderful holiday season.

james.lebinski 18:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ceyockey RfA edit

A generic but nonetheless warm "thank you" for your support in my RfA. I'm glad that you affirmed Radiant's nomination and I'll be measured in my use of the cleaning closet's contents. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

My RfA edit

 
Deepfriedokra/Archive 8, thank you for your support in my RfA which passed on 13th December 2006 with a tally of 49/10/5. I am delighted by the result and a little daunted by the scope of additional responsibilities; I shall be cautious in my use of the new tools. I am well aware that becoming an Admin is not just about a successful nomination, but a continuing process of gaining further experience; for this I shall welcome your feedback. Again, many thanks for supporting my RfA, feel free to contact me if you need any assistance. :-) David Ruben 03:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank You! edit

Thank you for your input at my RFA, which successfully closed at 58/2/0. I will think about the 10 questions and answers I had, and I hope that I will use the tools constructively and for the benefit of Wikipedia. If you ever need any help, don't be afraid to drop me a line. I'm here to help afterall! ‎8) -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


RfA thanks!

  Thank you so much, Dlohcierekim, for your gracious support in my RfA (48/1/0)! I am very happy that you trust me with this great honor and privilege. If at any time you think that I need to step back and take a deep breath or just want to talk, please contact me. Happy editing! Cbrown1023 03:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply  


My recent RfA edit

Thank you for considering my RfA. It was a very humbling yet surprisingly gratifying experience. I am grateful for all the constructive comments that will undoubtedly make me a better contributer, and hopefully a stronger candidate in the future. Grika 15:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Categories for Yoshida family artists edit

I have been asked to place several of my articles into a category. Please help me by placing these articles in the category "Japanese artists": "Yoshida family artists"; "Hodaka Yoshida"; "Fujio Yoshida"; "Chizuko Yoshida"; "Ayomi Yoshida"; and also these articles "Hiroshi Yoshida"; "Toshi Yoshida . Thanks! Mitakadai 02:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Thank you and good bye edit

After some thought, I have decided that being a Wikipedia editor is no longer for me. I first joined in 2006 and since then it's just gotten too stessfull for my tastes. It's no longer about building a knowledge base as much as it's about determining policy. Newbies get bitten while perfectly legitimate articles and pictures, representing doubtless thousands of person-hours of work, get deleted because "policy wonks" think it doesn't meet the right guidelines or its not good because they disagree on it - be them "notability" (an open-ended sham), the horrifically exclusive new fair use policy on pictures, or whatever else. Meanwhile, editors who continually add nonsense , unsourced and bunk get a blind eye turned to, while legitimate editors are scorned. This is no longer a project I want to be associated with. I thank you however for the help at the start --Markhamman 17:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks but there an editor(s) that believe that if you not wiki thier way on the subject of the Halifax Regional Municipality you an automatic sockpuppet of User:Matthvm . It got to the point of being very stressful and in my opinion devalues the efforts of others who want to put quality into wikipedia and make it a creditable and factual source of information . Gosh they even cannot find the right IP of my computer .--Markhamman 16:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

User:The Thursturain Chronicles edit

Thank you for those replies, sorry, this massege is a bit late, i was busy during the winter. i would like to tell you that we, Sam M, Will L and James M, are very grateful for your help, and have taken in what you have said. we will give you an update when we release the book, but if you want any more information, i would have to consult with James and Will. if they agree to give more information, then we might send a chapter or two, we need other people's ideas on improving the novel. Thanks again —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Thursturain Chronicles (talkcontribs) 08:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Image tagging for Image:Bock_color3.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Bock_color3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Jacques_Plante,_Montreal_Canadiens_goalie.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacques_Plante,_Montreal_Canadiens_goalie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECUtalk 17:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

About the Vandalism edit

I'm sorry about the vandalism to those Wikipedia pages from this computer. This is actually a High School computer located in a library where any student can access it. I believe it would be best that you block this IP address from editing pages on Wikipedia. That would stop all of the vandalism that comes from here. Once again, I'm sorry for the immaturity of my fellow peers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.190.160.35 (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Important edit

Please do not speak to me like that, I am very insulted and will tell all my friends never to visit this website. Thank you, Simrat —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.163.188.236 (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

Sorry if I offended you, but if this complaint is about your contributions as User:Simrat then I would ask you to remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the non constructive edits are generally reverted. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

hello edit

Hello, this is Michael Petrovski the guy who has a hate page aginst him from a single individual. I know who it is but cannot prove it to the fact. Is it possible to get an IP address of who edited and created that ;last hate speech on fictional perverted and obnoxius comments about me, my family and my culture. Unbder new law in my School District anyone who cyber bullies or make comments on them online or publishes them are deems to an suspension and/or expulsion. my email is mp.productions@hotmail.com

I am outraged because I see this individual several times a day and he smirks with arrogance on writing bullshit about me.

Your help is greatly appreciated to take down an Asshole who nobody likes and he choses to put his rage on me.

IF you are offended by the swearing then i am sorry.

Thank You —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.52.154.23 (talkcontribs). Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the tardiness of my respnse. When I try to sign in as Dlohcierekim, it locks up the computer. It might be quicker to deal with the matter at your end. You could try posting a motice at the admin notice board. I will check further and try fo formulate a more constructive response. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ah, it looks like the matter has been dealt with with an indefinite block and the deletion of Michael Petrovski. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 14:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dale Walker edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Dale Walker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Megapixie 13:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the tardy and moot response. When I try to log on as Dlohcierekim, the computer locks up. I just put a clean up tag on the thing. Apparently it was not about a sufficiently notable subject. Thanks. Cheers, :) MikeReichold 13:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chronology vs Timeline edit

I left you a reply here just about forty thousand years later! --Mal 20:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply