Welcome

edit

Hello Djtechno95, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope that you have enjoyed contributing and want to stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you need any more information, plenty of help is available - check out Wikipedia:Questions; ask your question here and attract help with the code {{helpme}}; or leave me a message on my talk page explaining your problem and I will help as best as I can. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

ko:틀:서명 달기 알림 --SineBot (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Kylie Minogue Rare and Unreleased, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fbifriday (talk) 19:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kylie Minogue Rare and Unreleased. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fbifriday (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The discussion can be found here. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

You have threatened another editor with a block. This is absolutely forbidden, on the basis that you have no authority or ability to implement this threat, which is the prerogative of administrators. Never ever repeat this activity or you may find yourself blocked for a much longer period.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Djtechno95 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't want to make the world messy, I just want those freaks to stop making the world boring.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Djtechno95 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you can please unblock me, I will stop making bad contributions. Even the page I tried to stop the deletion of needs voting on. Before you try to delete that page, please ask everyone on Wikipedia to vote on whether or not it should be deleted.

Decline reason:

Given the disruptive nature of your edits, I think it's reasonable for you to wait until your block expires- if you like, you could spend the time reading some more of Wikipedia's guidelines, or observing other deletion discussions to see how people make useful contributions to them. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Victorious (soundtrack), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song). Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 12:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability of All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song)

edit

Currently, this song is not notable, failing WP:NSONG. I'm giving it a day or two before redirecting the song again. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! - SummerPhD (talk) 12:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please explain at Talk:All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song)#Notability why you think that WP:NSONG does not apply to this article. As it stands now the redirect is effectively a place holder for if the song does become notable. Continuing to remove the redirect may result in an WP:AFD and the song article deleted and creation protected. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All I Want Is Everything (Victoria Justice song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Youtube's joke

edit

Youtube's live stream is a joke. If you go to the 3-minute video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H542nLTTbu0 , then expand the video description and go to the bottom of the description, it clearly says "By the way... April Fools! ;-)". Would they have said "April Fools" if it wasn't a joke? My answer would be no, if it was just like any day they could've written "April 1" or even "April Fools Day" (they don't mention "Day"). There's strong evidence for the fact that it is a joke: for example, if they had been serious, you probably would have expected them to mention this at the front page, but you can only find the video by either visiting their official blog or by visiting YouTube's official video profile. Also, the 3-minute video was shown as a "big" video at YouTube's official profile page, but now it's just listed below the "Recent activities" list. And, I can't find any reasons for them announcing this on April 1, if it indeed was true. Every newspaper is also calling it an April Fools joke. HeyMid (contribs) 20:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Woman in Me (Shania Twain album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | headline = Australian 2CD release bonus disc "The Woman in Me: Radio Remixes")

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shania Twain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page God Bless The Child (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Become a member of WP:Tejano

edit

Hello, I've noticed your contributions to articles related to regional Mexican music. I would like to invite you to the Regional Mexican music taskforce a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain Regional Mexican music-related articles. If you'd like to join, please sign up here. Thank you, .jonatalk 17:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dreaming of You (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dreaming of You (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

December 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Band Aid 30, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of EastEnders characters (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Altman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The X Factor (UK series 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Morning Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Phil Mitchell reversion

edit

Can you advise on what was wrong with the edit?

Regards Footballedits2016 (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC) Footballedits2016 (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Let's Get Rocked, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to I'm with You (song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 123.136.112.219 (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at You Belong with Me, you may be blocked from editing. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Love Bites (Def Leppard song). Chase (talk | contributions) 21:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Speak Now. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 18:09, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

Can you please stop changing genres? You did it again at Should've Said No. – FenixFeather (talk)(Contribs) 23:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Djtechno95. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Love Bites (Def Leppard song). SummerPhDv2.0 01:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 03:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Microsoft Office XP, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Djtechno95. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Big Bang Theory plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- AlexTW 00:45, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

X Factor Final

edit

Please stop vandalizing the wiki page for x factor series 15. itv have said the final will be a one night show on 1st December --Slindsell15 (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

VANDALIZUM

edit

You really need to stop vandalizing wiki. The truth is some newspapers say 1st dec and some say 2nd dec. if you watched the fist few episodes of x factor you will see that during the break adverts that it was said by the narrator that x factors final is on 1st dec I can and will report you if you don't stop. --Slindsell15 (talk) 14:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Djtechno95. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Djtechno95. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Shake It Off (Mariah Carey song), you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhDv2.0 04:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. (Editing as User:2a00:23c0:6f85:f500:f5ab:9564:fd04:b240.) SummerPhDv2.0 12:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfie Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello, Djtechno95, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Techoliver298 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 183.171.115.21 (talk) 05:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pyromania (album). Robvanvee 04:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at 9 to 5 (Dolly Parton song). Binksternet (talk) 16:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please remember to login

edit

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing.

This was discussed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Djtechno95. As you've already been blocked twice, and have received many warnings, for various disruptive practices, should you continue to edit while not logged in, your next block will be for a much more substantial period of time, possibly indefinitely. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 11 Years Later, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karen Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion

edit

Block evasion using Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:C6C4:4100:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 22:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Djtechno95 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I understand that I was blocked for being a sockpuppet, but abusing multiple accounts was never my intention. I always have good intentions whenever I'm browsing or wanting to contribute on a positive level to Wikipedia and I know where I've gone a bit too far this time, but there are other editors who I've seen who cause much worse damage or disruption on a regular basis. The reason I never responded to the sockpuppet allegations was because I wanted this issue to decay long enough to not be an issue, but the fact that it backfired at me was no-one's fault but mine. I know what I've been blocked for, I apologize for it, and I vow to be more careful whenever I browse on Wikipedia. djtechno95 12:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your attitude strikes me as still a little dodgy—you were hoping the socking allegation would go away, you talk about others being worse than what you did, and that you never meant well. So I'm not comfortable letting bygones be bygones here. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.