Blue Chip Expert edit

You deleted the page Blue Chip Expert which was still being created. Per the reference below I would ask that you please undo the speedy deletion and let me finish the article with all references and relevance.

Deletion is not required if a page meets these criteria. Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere or be handled with some other action short of deletion. If this is possible, speedy deletion is probably inappropriate. Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete. Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criteria the page meets and consider notifying the page's creator. [[1]]

Thanks, Djkwk7 (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you are working on the article you should put a maintenance tag on it to let other editors know. If an article of yours is tagged for speedy deletion and you want to keep it you should put a {{hangon}} tag on it and immediately explain your reasons in the Talk page.
In stead of posting an article that is almost empty of all content like the one you created, and not even categorized or marked as a stub, you should work it offline or in your user space until it has some information to ascertain its notability. Also, the article as it stood at CSD time it was a toss-up between A7 (notability) and G11 (advertisement), both reasons for deletion. I have restored the article as per your request. I cannot guarantee that other editors will find it valuable or tag it for CSD or PROD. Go at it and see what hapens. Happy wiking. -- Alexf42 19:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
In answer to your question, it was deleted because it failed to show notability (unlike the articles for the other companies you cite) and constituted pure marketing or promotion. I don't think that the article merits being restored (although you're welcome to take it to WP:Deletion review if you disagree). If you have email enabled I can, however, email you the code you created? GBT/C 06:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you - I think your messages might have got lost in amongst other new messages, and I haven't been around for a bit. Looking again, the actual reason I recorded in the deletion log was that the article constituted blatant advertising, which would have required a substantial rewrite in order to constitute an encyclopaedia article. Again, if you're unhappy with the deletion, then feel free to take it to deletion review, but I'm afraid, having reviewed the article, I remain of the same opinion. GBT/C 19:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BlueChipExpert.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:BlueChipExpert.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Blue Chip Expert Home Page.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Blue Chip Expert Home Page.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply