Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! DivisionalB, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Moredecai

edit

I was wondering why you made this edit to the userpage for Moredecai. Are you related to that account? Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • You also made this edit to Fixer88. It's enough to where you appear to be the same user trying to return in a new account. Per sockpuppetry guidelines this is not permitted and all attempts to rejoin Wikipedia need to be done via the main account. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:01, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

Is it also as well to confuse a person 1st as a vandal and then say he has frauded WP by Role Account preferentially when I verify myself as a contributing identity and not acknowledging sock puppetry? It is warranting my discipline and not your program bot approval. --DivisionalB (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply