Apparently I was unsuccessful in making my point. The article is concerning the Great Global Warming Swindle film, not Ofcom and its public relations issues. I don't think anyone it trying to "hide" anything (as you put). It should also not be a crusade to discredit any work that opposes the latest mass hysteria. The film, arguably, has as much credibility, if not more than its counterpart An Inconvenient Truth. Yet the wiki article for the later bares no such relative criticism. This demonstrates a serious bias on the part of those who unfortunately favor the global warming argument. I say unfortunately because they are clearing unwilling to be critical of their position. Personally, I think the article should be reduced to a clear and objective description leaving the debate to other links as necessary. Certainly opposition to this approach would demonstrate bias. Dispelling37 (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)