Welcome!

edit

Hello, Disojak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Charu Modi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bisswajit 18:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Charu Modi

edit
 

The article Charu Modi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References consisting of passing mention with no in depth coverage. Delete per WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bisswajit 18:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for the heads up, Bisswajit. The passing reference objection, albeit valid to a certain extent, doesn't necessarily imply that the reference is irrelevant. The references stated in this article are relevant (admittedly brief), but it doesn't warrant deletion, in my opinion. Besides, this is a work in progress and I'll be adding further sources to back up my argument.

Disojak (talk) 03:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC) DisojakReply

Talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Disojak. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Disojak. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 07:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

A page you started (Charu Modi) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Charu Modi, Disojak!

Wikipedia editor King Of The Wise just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A pretty good article. Keep improving. :)

To reply, leave a comment on King Of The Wise's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Replaceable fair use File:CharuModi2000.pdf

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CharuModi2000.pdf. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CharuModi2000.pdf

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:CharuModi2000.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CharuModi2000.pdf

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:CharuModi2000.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samir Modi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jevansen (talk) 11:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply