Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, DishingMachine, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! DishitaBhowmik talk 13:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Talk page comments

edit

Hi, I just removed a talk page comment of yours, [1], because you added it in the middle of a thread (and in fact in the middle of someone else's comment). Feel free to re add, but please remember to sign it, and it add it in the proper chronological place: at the end. - MrOllie (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

thanks, I'm new, still figuring out formatting--DishingMachine (talk) 22:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)DishingMachineReply

January 2021

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Bell Curve; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Race and intelligence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The article Race and intelligence is subject to 1RR restrictions, which means that you must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article. Please self-revert in order to avoid sanctions. Generalrelative (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Scholarly Barnstar
Your discussion and attempted inclusion of a peer-reviewed source is commendable. Reaper1945 (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit