August 2014 edit

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Volunteer Marek. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RGloucester 20:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I do not care about yor shite blocking. You are a guy who hate s Germans and you cannot take the truth.

Nationalistic Polesh initiated the blocking, which is a shame.

  Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Volunteer Marek may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Discordion (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Volunteer Marek is guarding special articles on critical Polish-German topics as if they were his own property. He provides only Polish language references, which cannot be verified without translation. I had asked for such translations a long time ago, but he never wrote a single one. I do not believe that this sort of "owning" and shielding articles is in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. Furthermore, I suspect that "Volunteer Marek" is not a single person, but a group of Polish users with a nationalistic agenda. I do conclude so, because "Mareks" actions against any of my edits in several articles were extremely quick, regardless of day or night time and always reproachful like "you are a German nationalist" without considering the presented facts in the first place. It is obvious that his intentions are preserving a Polish biased history by excluding any fact that is not in favour of an extremely positive view of Poland and the Polish people.

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:25, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Discordion (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Volunteer Marek´s administrator friends blocked me against WIKIPEDIA rules. I did only delete Marek´s references, which were unreliable, e.g., in Polish language without corresponding translation. The rule is clear: " By citing sources for Wikipedia content, you enable users to verify that the information given is supported by reliable sources". None of Volunteer Mareks numerous references fulfills this criterion. Thus, his and the associated administrator´s actions against me were illegal in the context of WIKIPEDIA rules.


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Discordion (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18499 was submitted on Jun 12, 2017 21:33:57. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Discordion (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The former admin "Malik Shabazz" blocked my account based on motives that most likely include (according to Wikipedia) Black nationalism, Black Power, Support for reparations for slavery, Conspiracy theories about Jewish involvement in the September 11 attacks, The view that Jews dominated the Atlantic slave trade Anti-Zionism. He clearly supported Polish nationalists, who control topics regarding Polish-German conflicts, i.e. by using only references in Polish language, which cannot be verified, twisting facts aso. I critisized this practice, but my concerns were not taken serious.

Decline reason:

You are not going to get yourself unblocked by making personal attacks like that. In fact, if I see any more of the same, you will be losing your ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, having further reviewed your history, I have reinstated the previous declined unblock requests which you are not allowed to remove while still blocked, and as you clearly have not, in the course of nearly three years, learned to refrain from personal attacks, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. You know where to find WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply