The Board of Directors of Kappa Delta Phi National Fraterntiy request that you stop editing the external links section of this article. The site that you are including is not officially recognized by the Fraternity nor its National Board of Directors. You are also removing officially recognized external links, please discontinue your practice of doing this. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenlantern (talkcontribs) 15:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Once again the National Board of Directors of Kappa Delta Phi National Fraternity are requesting that you discontinue the practice of deleting legitimate external links to sites of Kappa Delta Phi National Fraternity. You are continually vandalizing the article, by removing legitimate external links to officially sponsored external links and then adding your own external link instead. Please stop this practice at once as it is misleading and intentionally misdirects members. comment added by Goldenlantern

Kappa Delta Phi national affiliated sorority edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kappa Delta Phi national affiliated sorority, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kappadeltaphi.org/sorority.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Kappa Delta Phi national affiliated sorority edit

 

A tag has been placed on Kappa Delta Phi national affiliated sorority requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.    SIS  00:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply