Does anyone know what happened to Rhodes Patterson's finished films created for Walter Paepcke's“Great Ideas of Western Man” Container Corporation of America’s documentary film series ... an outgrowth of Robert Hutchin’s and Mortimer Adler’s “Great Books of the Western World”? Dirsmith2 Dirsmith2 (talk) 22:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 19 August

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ronald L. Dirsmith

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Ronald L. Dirsmith, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Container Corporation of America. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

We placed information on a new page, Ronald L. Dirsmith, that was originally posted on Container Corporation of America's site as part of the Chicago Film Archives Collection. It inter-relates both sites with a common archival film collection by the Chicago Film Archives. Thank your for the question. This is our first attempt at this procedure and is quite a challenge.Dirsmith2 (talk) 03:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[1] Dirsmith2 (talk) 03:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ronald L. Dirsmith

edit
 

The article Ronald L. Dirsmith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a coatrack article as it isn't actually about Dirsmith, and I can't exactly determine what it's supposed to be about - however, not quite a no-context speedy delete

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

I assume that you are Ronald - I would like to let you know that it is absolutely unacceptable to be writing articles about yourself. If you are notable enough to have an article about you, then someone else will write it in time. Wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself or your projects. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronald L. Dirsmith

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronald L. Dirsmith, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mozza&pomo

edit

Creating a new account to make the edits you have been told not to is a good way to be permanently banned. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dirsmith2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Dirsmith2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ from the ChicagoFilm Archives Collection