Dimspace

Re: Puccio

Apologies for the way I worded it in the edit summary; definitely had no intention to offend, but you definitely have to be wary of other websites taking content from here to fill any spaces on a specific person. Now, I hadn't viewed the Puccio bio on the Sky page until when I edited the article, and thus had no idea that the original text entered by yourself had been there longer than it had been on the Sky page. Hence, where my accusation of a copyvio came in. So yeah, many apologies...and just write it in a confusing way so that the other websites can't steal the content! Ha. Craig(talk) 15:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ah, terrific. Hopefully with your help, we can get the 2012 season page like last year's page. Hopefully just as many successes, although more than 28 will be an achievement for the team I feel. Craig(talk) 15:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Ricco

Your calling Ricco "one of the most promising talents of Italian and international road cycling" is not a neutral point of view. 72.225.17.226 (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Ive no idea why you put this on my talk page. I didnt make that edit. I purely put a single line in the first paragraph linking to the impartial eurosport report. Personally that entire final line "This set the end of the professional career of one of the most promising talents of Italian and international road cycling." should go because its not clear his career will be over, its not neutral, there may yet be an appeal etc. Dimspace (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

policing LA's entry - bravo

Surprised to see you policing the entry of Lance Armstrong to ensure that info such as TdF "wins" aren't "deleted"/removed until such time as officially stripped. Bravo. joepa^T 03:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I think if left the page will quickly degenerate into chaos. Its important that once he is banned, that the page be well written and accurately reflects teh whole story. everyone going mad now and just deleting stuff will just get teh page locked down the line.

Lance Armstrong

Are you stupid? Lance Armstrong has been banned for life, stripped of 7 Tour win as reported by USA Today, The Washington Post, Yahoo Sports and other sources. Sk8terguy27 (talk) 02:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

You seem to be well informed on the issues. There has been an attempt at WT:CYC to get a centralised discussion, although it is, rather illogically, located at talk:1999 Tour de France. Your contribution would be useful. Kevin McE (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm rather concerned that you have struck the results of Hincapie/Barry etc as though those removals are ratified, while we are holding off doing that for the ring leader. Kevin McE (talk) 06:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

The results of Hincapie, Barry etc have all been ratified. They have all accepted their bans and signed afidavits to that effect accepting their bans, stripping of results and prize monies, as they have accepted them thats it, theres no reason for the UCI to ratify the results stripping, all that can happen is UCI to appeal the length of the bans. In the case of Armstrong, he hasnt accepted the ban, the governing body hasnt accepted the decision so its a different situation. Trust me, im completely anti armstrong, but, when his page is changed, we need to make sure thats its an accurate portrayal of him and what a peice of crap he really is. have patience. Dave Dimspace (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

I certainly knew that you were no Pharmstrong-ite: I hadn't intended any criticism of that. I knew you too well on another forum, Mr TSF (I am AC in that "other place"), to suggest that: it just looked odd, not biased. But I wasn't aware that the processes in their cases had been thus expedited. I also agree with you that striking through is the correct way to do such things (and spent some time applying exactly that method to Valverde's results for early 2010) Kevin McE (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

No worries. Ultimately, to get the right results on the Lance Armstrong page, we have to play things totally by the book, have patience, be the voice of logic and reason, and come the time for edits, amidst the idiots, be the voices that determine how the page is edited. Dimspace (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For your contributions pertaining to the Lance Armstrong doping scheme on the articles of the blokes whose results have been voided, I award you the original Barnstar! Keep up the good work! Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 02:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Changing all those freaking results everywhere will be a daunting task, CS-Wolves thinks we should wait to see what the corrupted lawful blokes at the UCI will decide to do. Nice to "know" you :) Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 02:33, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

I also wanted to say thank you for your work on the Armstrong article. Way to keep it NPOV. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Have you ever taken any journalism or editing classes? You are obviously lacking in NPOV. LA's activites as a tri-athlete are negligible and EASILY dwarfed by just about everything else in his life. It is well covered in later entries and DO NOT merit a mention in the leading paragraph, unless you are trying to sanitize his image. It is very regrettable but Mr. Armstrong's greatest legacy now will be sorry one: the most notorious case of doping in the history of sports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oprah999 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

That is what you think. Why don't you put the fact that he was engaged to Sheryl Crow, a very major artist and world-famous celebrity, in the lead paragraph? That bit of information would be much more important to a lot of people, than the fact that he participated in endurance competitions after retiring from cycling. You are either biased in favor of LA, or in favor of minor endurance sports. Please educate yourself in information value and newsworthiness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oprah999 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lance Armstrong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Barry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Frank Schleck

What do you mean "and really no need for positive spin on when he can return"? Also, he really originally claimed he was poisoned, why remove it? Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 04:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

poisoning was unsourced. it was one of those rumours that was just flying around, he suggested a multitude of things, poisoning, supplement, accidental ingestion, not just poisoning. on the ban return, just slightly more npov to put the ban started on, rather than "he is free to ride". there is still time for either he or the uci to appeal. feel free to change it. Dimspace (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, that's OK, you're right it was one of the rumors flying around, to list them all would be a little pointless. In hindsight, I agree :) Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 18:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

PS: By the way, Michael Rasmussen spilled the beans today. It's incredible how our beloved sport is getting hammered. I'd like to hear about football and tennis and all, I don't think they are very pure either... Mattaidepikiw (Talk)

tennis is very close to being blown apart. Keep an eye on what goes on in FLorida. As for football, the fuentes case is ongoing and so far the spanish courts have blocked the release of his little black book containing all the names. Spainish authorities are doing their very best to sweep the whole thing under the carpet and protect their football teams Dimspace (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, the judge said Fuentes does not have to name any other athlete other than cyclists. Ridiculous! I hope people will speak up. Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 22:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

I edited the Eufemiano Fuentes article, with today's news, if you want to help, it would be appreciated, especially on the Operacion Puerto article, I don't want to just copypasta stuff and I'm tired tonight. Just a suggestion, not an obligation of course. I appreciate you npov disposition. (BTW, you seemed to have angered a Lance Armstrong basher above! Funny read lol) Mattaidepikiw (Talk) 01:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

yeh, the irony is, as far as Armstrong goes I have been one of the most vocal against him for many many years. COuntless articles done. And when Bicycling magazine in america approached the leading social media people to comment on the interview, i was one of the five picked to write a peice. So when the biggest cycling magazine in america names you as one of the most influental people on social media at bringing down the armstrong myth its amusing to be called out as an armstrong lover.

On Puerto, I will have a look. .Im going to try and see if a friend of mine will come over and lend a hand. He runs dopeology.org and is one of the most knowledgable on puerto and has no pov issues, hes very factual. Hes doing some fairly good key point summaries on my forum http://velorooms.com/the-dark-side/operation-puerto/msg83323/#new so I might be able to bring him across. If not, I will ask his permission to use his summaries as a basis for some information as they cover the key facts. and then he credits where he gets his info so we would have no problem hunting down his original sources. Dimspace (talk) 19:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm JMHamo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jordon Ibe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 15:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dimspace. You have new messages at JMHamo's talk page.
Message added 21:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JMHamo (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Dimspace. You have new messages at JMHamo's talk page.
Message added 23:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JMHamo (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alto de L'Angliru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Horner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Flanagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glen Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alessandro Ballan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WADA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

JTL's ToB "win"

Hey. I saw you reverted my edit to the 2012 Tour of Britain article, explaining "Anything Endura have said regarding his ban is relevant to JTL's page, not the TOB page which deals purely with the race". However, the sentence from the Endura statement wasn't about his ban, it was specifically about him being stripped of this race win. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hour record, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 209.104.250.2 (talk) 21:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hour record (recumbents), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eric Edwards and Richard Crane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Hour record

Hi there Dimspace, can you re-edit the tables in the article only some IP has come along and set them to auto-expand and the article looks a mess again. Is there a way to protect the article so IPs cant edit? XyZAn (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

I've un-done what the IP had done to the page, but iut of interest - could you set the two historical tables to auto-collapsed? Thanks XyZAn (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hour record, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wiggins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Hour record page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sibiu Cycling Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Team Soigneur-Copenhagen Pro Cycling 2016 Jersey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Team Soigneur-Copenhagen Pro Cycling 2016 Jersey.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dimspace. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dimspace. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Dana White's Tuesday Night Contender Series) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dana White's Tuesday Night Contender Series, Dimspace!

Wikipedia editor Chris troutman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This content would have been better built at Dana White or UFC Fight Pass and then spun out. I don't think the subject merits a standalone article.

To reply, leave a comment on Chris troutman's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chris Troutman (talk) 17:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Concerning Talk:2017_Sibiu_Cycling_Tour#Removal_of_social_media_links

First of all, if you have problems with my edits then please address them properly to me.

Your statement contains numerous mistakes: "WP:ELMINOFFICIAL is very clear that aditional links are permitted if they are not linked to from teh main website or if they are significant." .. no .. that is not there. They are permitted under very few limited circumstances, and normally we list only one; and we only list them if "the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites". The Romanian twitter is indeed not linked from the official website (but whether a Romanian twitter is of general interest to an English reading audience is questionable). The English twitter however could contain info, but that one is, prominently, linked and does not need to be linked again. "This is part of an ongoing edit war by user: Beetstra who appears to be on a one man edit war to remove social media links from wikipedia despite numerous complaints." .. no, this is not an edit war, over 99% of the removals do not even get reverted once, let alone that there is edit warring over it. It is also not one man, there are other editors doing the same, all according to policy/guideline (in fact, I removed them originally, you reverted them back in, and then another editor removed them on their own account). 'Numerous' is also questionable, on the thousands and thousands of links I have removed (and which generally stay removed), I have only received some complaints (with a similar magnitude of 'thanks'). The ones that have been reverted (and re-reverted ..) have all been discussed, and where necessary discussions have been escalated to WT:EL or WP:ELN, where constantly the decision has been kept up that these links do not belong. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 13:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

You now are reinserting the links against three (3) other editors who keep telling you that you do not have consensus to include these links. You are one reinsertion short of a block, consider this your final warning. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 19:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Dirk Beetstra Three editors, you are three people?? Dude, get a life. who exactly are you to be threatening me with blocking? PS. for future editions of that race you can do the pages because youve just lost the editor that put the work in.. So i fully expect to see you keeping those pages up to date and of the quality expected.. Dimspace (talk) 21:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Me, user:Stesmo, user:Klilidiplomus. Three. Three editors that you edit war with against continuing consensus that more than one official site is hardly ever allowed and that twitter feeds are generally discouraged. We have been trying to tell you continuously that those links are not suitable and should not be there. You choose not to repond to that, so here we are. I am not going to get involved in the contents of those pages, these edits are purely to get these pages in line with our policies and guidelines. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 06:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Dirk Beetstra Dude you are flat out lying now. I have never had a single piece of communication with user:Stesmo, user:Klilidiplomus ever not once. Ive never even heard of them until now. NOthing on my talk page, nothing on their talk page, nothing on the article talk page. So enough with this, "We have been trying to tell you...." How can "we" apply if ive never even spoken to either of those editors EVER.. You have already admitted that you arent following the additional links to check if they are significantly different, you arent checking websites, you are just mass deleting tons of links without even checking. You even put things in the comments like "deleting blogs and fansites" how is a twitter link a blog or a fansite? that proves you arent even looking at what you are deleting. Youve admitted that. Now you are saying that two other editors have addressed this with me despite nothing on my talk page, nothing on their talk pages, and nothing on the article talk pages. You come across as a sad little man who has nothing better to do that mass delete things without even checking. what purpose does it serve? does it make you happy? does it leave you feeling fulfilled somehow? Anyway, keep off of my talk page now please. I dont need you hear, and certainly stop making things up by saying two other editors have contacted me which anyone can discover in a few minutes of checking simply isnt true. Dimspace (talk) 17:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Ever heard of edit summaries. —Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 18:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry for not popping in sooner here after the ping, User:Beetstra & Dimspace; I'm in the midst of some IRL commitments. Dimspace, you are correct. I haven't popped up here, as I had hoped my edit summary (with a link to WP:EL) would suffice. My edits were done inline with what Wikipedia and consensus have determined for the contents of External Links sections. In my EL section edits, I will remove Twitter links if there is already an official website listed. Especially when the subject themselves already link to all of their social media platforms from their official website. If the subject of the article has *only* one place under their control that we can link to and that is Twitter, there is no problem leaving it in the EL section. If all of the other links are dead, except for the Twitter link, then let's also keep the Twitter link. This is not the case here, though, is it?

I do hope you can find a way to continue editing Wikipedia whilst working alongside the relatively minor and easily observed WP:EL. Thanks, Stesmo (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dimspace. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Sibiu Cycling Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksandr Vlasov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dimspace. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dimspace. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andy Lonergan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Mattythewhite well stop deleting stuff while people are in the middle of edits. deleting his substitute appearance which was already sourced on the page, and would have taken you less time to copy across than start undoing things. You arent giving people time to finish their edits. I was in the middle of putting sources on for multiple years of the player of the year but you can do it yourself now. Dimspace (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It doesn't take more than one edit to add a source. I see you've gone and done it again! Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andy Lonergan, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

I bloomin well did not remove the maintenance edit again!!!!!!! Check the edits. Adding an internal link to another wiki page AND NOT REMOVING THE MAINTENANCE EDIT is not disruptive editing. Check the edits!! Yes i did originally. You posted on my page. So all i did after that was put an internal link in. I DID NOT REMOVE the ME. If you want to warn me im happy to take this further because everyone can see the edit I made and I did NOT remove the maintanance edit. There was zero reason for you to remove that last edit, it was a perfectly valid edit adding a link to another related page. Mattythewhite Dimspace (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Added for evidence purposes. Screencap 231219 / 0215 utc - clearly did not remove maintenance edit. All was added was link to another wiki page which Mattythewhite saw fit to remove for no reason. Now either admit you made a mistake. Or get off my page with your threatening to ban people from editing because you messed up. Thank you. Im quite happy to take this further if you want to. The history clearly shows there was nothing wrong with that last edit. Dimspace (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Mattythewhite While we are on the topic, your removal the text about him being on the bench for the club world cup final because it had no source. There was already a source present on the page and all you had to do was copy that ref in. Let me remind you of guidance on the wiki Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution guidelines for disputable content. "When you find a passage in an article that is biased, inaccurate, or unsourced the best practice is to improve it if you can rather than deleting salvageable text." Best practice is to improve it (ie. copy the source across), rather than deletion. So again, please dont start dishing out warnings at me when you yourself dont follow guidelines. Cheers. Dimspace (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Celtic Social Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Donnelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Andy Lonergan, you may be blocked from editing. Content not supported by source. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

That edit was in DECEMBER 2019 and was addressed then. Kindly do not come on my talk page threatening bans over an edit from 7 months ago especially when if you read up about 3" you will see you already dishing out warnings in December. Dimspace (talk) 01:44, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)