Your Question edit

Hey. While I don't have many experiences with nav tables, the one you showed me was in a template. You can find more info about them here.

The one you posted on my talk page is at Template:Months if you want to see the syntax.

Basically, if you want the table just to be on that page you linked to me (European Hit Radio Top 40), you should just put the table right on the page. Now if you want it to be on every Euro Hit Radio Top 40 page (as a nav table at the top or bottom of the pages), you'd make it a template...say Template:EuroHitRadioNav, and then put {{EuroHitRadioNav}} in the pages where you want the table to show up.

Me, I'm not that good at tables so if you need specific help, I encourage you to ask somewhere else (maybe the Village Pump).

Ilyanep (Talk) 16:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

European Top 40 article edit

OK, I see. I still think it should be deleted because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information like which songs were on the top 40 list for this week. If you still disagree, I will take it to articles for deletion and we will have a vote on it. Recury 18:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Latvia location in Europe.png edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Latvia location in Europe.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:New LTV logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:New LTV logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:New_LTV7_logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:New_LTV7_logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


Fair use rationale for Image:Madonna Hard Candy cover.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Madonna Hard Candy cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image with no source edit

  Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Hard Candy (Madonna album), and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - eo (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Source of Image:Madonna Hard Candy cover.jpg edit

Hi. I was wondering if you could say where you obtained the image linked above. Ericorbit is unsure of its authenticity (see: User talk:Puchiko#re: Hard Candy). A simple hyperlink will surely clear up any doubts, so could you please specify the image source at the image description page or elsewhere? Thanks! Puchiko (Talk-email) 21:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Here is link where I put note from where i take this image [1]. --Digital1 (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. It is appreciated :) Puchiko (Talk-email) 12:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please amend the description of this image. There is no basis to say it is the cover for the album, or that Warner own it. It is from a fan-site (so unlikely to be real in the first place) and in any case, the website itself says that its images are only illustrative. This cover is based on a picture of Madonna taken about 5 years ago. JKW111 (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Madonna Hard Candy cover.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Madonna Hard Candy cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Number ones of European Hit Radio Top 40 (1995) edit

I have nominated Number ones of European Hit Radio Top 40 (1995), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number ones of European Hit Radio Top 40 (1995). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Wolfer68 (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:EuroHitRadioNav edit

 Template:EuroHitRadioNav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:EuroHitRadioNav edit

 Template:EuroHitRadioNav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Latvian charts edit

Please do not add the Latvian charts, or any other charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 00:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you have anything that shows those charts to be an official, notable chart, that decision can probably be reversed. It got listed on WP:BADCHARTS because of the deletion discussion, and the people discussing it there couldn't find any evidence that it was an official, notable chart. I didn't participate in that discussion, but I agree with its result: I can't find news sites or other reliable sources that point to these charts as being important charts.—Kww(talk) 01:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Riga montage 2009.png edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Riga montage 2009.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 02:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I created this mosaike by myself and all pictures are from wikipedia (6 of 9 is my personal pictures). Where's the problem? ---- Digital1 (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Riga montage 2009.png edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Riga montage 2009.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive edit: Riga edit

Your edit here; [2] is considered disruptive. Please be impartial. Slaja (talk) 04:30, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

House Sparrow distribution map edit

I've replied to your question at File talk:PasserDomesticusDistribution.png. —innotata 14:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Latvia edit

 

Hello, Digital1!

You are invited to participate in WikiProject Latvia, an outreach effort which aims to support development of Latvia related articles in Wikipedia. If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list.

I hope you accept! --Edgars2007 (Talk/Contributions) 17:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New LTV7 logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:New LTV7 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply