Welcome! edit

Hi Diamantinasaurus! I noticed your contributions to List of largest known stars and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of stars larger than any closer star edit

 

The article List of stars larger than any closer star has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG since there is no coverage in reliable sources. The page also relies on WP:SYNTHESIS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 19:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of stars larger than any closer star for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of stars larger than any closer star is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of stars larger than any closer star until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 09:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of G0.238-0.071 for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G0.238-0.071 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G0.238-0.071 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 15:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spinostropheus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syntarsus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply