Welcome!

Hello, Diaconia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bishop Panteleimon of Orekhovo-Zuyevo (Shatov), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tentontunic (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Bishop Panteleimon of Orekhovo-Zuyevo (Shatov) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tentontunic (talk) 07:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I converted the "External links" section to a reference and reflist. That would have been a better first step than nominating for deletion, no? Do not bite the newcomers. -- ke4roh (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Diaconia, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm leaving a note on Daniel's talk page to request an unblock. -- ke4roh (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
We've agreed that the block is in order because Diaconia is promotional for diaconia.ru, the site linked from your contribution, so yes, please do pick another user name, and hopefully the community will be more gentle with your contributions. -- 173.95.174.189 (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply