User talk:Devin/2012/04

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Renegade Monster in topic Never Shout Never discography

STiki: A new version and a thank you! edit

Greetings Devin. As the developer of the STiki anti-vandal tool, I would like to thank you for recent and non-trivial use of my software. Whether you just tried out the tool briefly or have been a long-term participant, I appreciate your efforts (as I am sure does the entire Wikipedia community)!

I write to inform you of a new version of the software (link goes to list of new features). This version addresses multiple long-term issues that I am happy to put behind us. Try it out! Provide some feedback!

The STiki project is also always seeking collaborators. In particular, we are seeking non-technical colleagues. Tasks like publicity, talk-page maintenance, advertisement, and barn-star distribution are a burden to technical development. If you are interested, write me at my talk page or STiki's talk page.

As STiki approaches two significant thresholds: (1) 100,000 revert actions and (2) 400 unique users -- I hope to have your support in continuing the efficient fight against unconstructive editing. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 00:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

a mistake? edit

i have to assume that this edit [1] was just a really bad mistake and not intentional? -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it was a mistake. I didn't even know that I did it until now. You see when Wikipedia doesn't load right and when you're on a tablet, diff and rollback on on top of each other. I blame my fingers. Devin Davis (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Revert? edit

Guessing it was a mistake, but was there any particular reason for this revert?

Gah, I see I missed the thread above. Happy editing. Calabe1992 16:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Never Shout Never discography edit

Please, explain this. Renegade Mons†er 23:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lets take a look at your edit. Now lets compare. On your's by removing two out of the three columns, the column that's left takes up what three columns did. Therefore on mine, three columns add flow and cleanliness throughout the page. Devin (talk) 06:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Three columns are not necessary when just one EP enter in one chart. Also, my edit have a reference. Renegade Mons†er 17:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
My edit has a reference also, in the previous table. There's no need to list them twice. Or unless it's a difference reference, then its okay to list it. But I only added three columns to make it look cleaner... Devin (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just one column are ok, I think. And yes, if is necessary, reference have to be repeated using <ref name="(reference name)"/>. Greetings. Renegade Mons†er 20:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply