Devilyouknow
Crocker edits
editYour vast gutting of well-referenced and relevant material from an article that has been quite stable is easily seen as not in good faith. Please use the talk page for discussion and consensus before you remove such a large portion of an article. Benjiboi 22:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your accusation of me not acting in good faith is, in fact, not in good faith. As indicated on the article history and the previosu AFD, it seems that anyone you disagree with is labeled as "not acting in good faith." So cut it out and discuss the merits. Devilyouknow 22:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Very happy to discuss as is evident throughout the history on the article and my involvement in it. I think anyone who looks at my actions will see that I have made every efforts at communicating and quickly addressing concerns to make the article better. Also, I wrote easily seen as not in good faith so I apologize as I didn't mean to accuse you of anything including not acting in good faith but I was trying to express that it was hard for me to see your edits as constructive. You may have some valid points but as other editors before (and after) me have pointed out those edits were too sweeping and doing so without discussion and consensus first seems to violate the collaborative nature of how articles are created and improved. Benjiboi 22:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well then, let's discuss on the talk page, shall we?? Devilyouknow 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've already responded to you there. Benjiboi 22:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well then, let's discuss on the talk page, shall we?? Devilyouknow 22:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Very happy to discuss as is evident throughout the history on the article and my involvement in it. I think anyone who looks at my actions will see that I have made every efforts at communicating and quickly addressing concerns to make the article better. Also, I wrote easily seen as not in good faith so I apologize as I didn't mean to accuse you of anything including not acting in good faith but I was trying to express that it was hard for me to see your edits as constructive. You may have some valid points but as other editors before (and after) me have pointed out those edits were too sweeping and doing so without discussion and consensus first seems to violate the collaborative nature of how articles are created and improved. Benjiboi 22:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dallas Association of Young Lawyers
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dallas Association of Young Lawyers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 11:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)