Page intentionally left blank


Reason

edit

Wikipedia has not met MY standard for free speech, human rights and preservation of existing reference material.
Wikipedia may not meet typical standards as applied to free speech as a human right.
Wikipedia "editors" have demonstrated a callousness towards typical users.
Defined as "abrupt, nonsensical, and arbitrary" challenges to authors, which seem to be censorship of speech.
The challenges to authored material are typically a "heavy handed talking down too" with an "imbecilic juvenile authoritarianism" meant more to confound than to enlighten.
Furthermore Wikipedia will out and out delete HOURS LONG TEXT MATERIAL..

The "falling out" with wikipedia lay in an obvious threat to "credible and researched reference material" which may endanger reliable sources of such.

--Devilslexicon (talk) 19:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC) --Devilslexicon (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012

edit