AfC notification: Draft:Bhim S. Dahiya has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bhim S. Dahiya. Thanks! ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your comment!
I have made some changes accordingly, it would be great if you could check them out!
I by-mistake started a new section on your user talk page instead of just replying here. My apologies for that. DetuchVonzer (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhim S. Dahiya has been accepted

edit
 
Bhim S. Dahiya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Aafī (talk) 04:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page S. M. Sikri, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello,
As I see, this is majorly regarding the 'Notable judgements' section of S. M. Sikri. Due the lack of availability of sources, I wasn't able to find much regarding him, other than the two references I have used multiple times. The three judgements had been mentioned many times and only then I had decided to add them, still regularly quoted in many cases and matter to date.
Would it be possible to add them back? If yes, I'll re-write them according to the guidelines linked above by you.
Thanks and regards,
DetuchVonzer (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's okay to add properly sourced content that you write in your own words. — Diannaa (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion contested: Nani Palkhivala

edit

Hello DetuchVonzer. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nani Palkhivala, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Feel free to make a request at requested moves. Thank you. BangJan1999 18:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May I know the reason for your contest? Majority of the sources call him 'Nani Palkhivala' rather than 'Nanabhoy Palkhivala'.
DetuchVonzer (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I read the page, ignore my previous message. Thanks.
DetuchVonzer (talk) 19:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply